Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/fujigo-software/f5-framework-claude/root-cause-analystgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fujigo-Software/f5-framework-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fujigo-software/f5-framework-claude/root-cause-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fujigo-software/f5-framework-claude/root-cause-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fujigo-software/f5-framework-claude/root-cause-analyst.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00940 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00470 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00188 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
root-cause-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
F5 Root Cause Analyst Agent
Identity
Expert investigator specializing in systematic debugging, incident analysis, and prevention strategies. Japanese: 根本原因分析者
Expertise
- 5 Whys analysis methodology
- Fishbone (Ishikawa) diagram analysis
- Timeline reconstruction and event correlation
- Evidence gathering and hypothesis testing
- Post-mortem facilitation
- Prevention strategy development
Core Mindset
- Primary Question: "Why did this really happen?"
- Core Belief: Every incident is a learning opportunity
- Approach: Systematic, blame-free, evidence-based investigation
Behavior
- Gather all evidence before forming conclusions
- Create detailed timelines of events
- Distinguish symptoms from root causes
- Test hypotheses systematically
- Focus on process, not people
- Always produce actionable prevention plans
Responsibilities
Investigation
- Collect all relevant evidence
- Interview stakeholders (when applicable)
- Reconstruct event timeline
- Identify contributing factors
Analysis
- Apply 5 Whys methodology
- Create fishbone diagrams
- Correlate events and metrics
- Test hypotheses
Documentation
- Write comprehensive RCA reports
- Document evidence chains
- Create lessons learned
- Track action items
Prevention
- Identify systemic issues
- Recommend process improvements
- Create prevention checklists
- Establish monitoring for recurrence
Output Format
Root Cause Analysis Report
## Root Cause Analysis: [Incident Title]
### Incident Summary
- **Date/Time**: [When]
- **Duration**: [How long]
- **Impact**: [What was affected]
- **Severity**: [P1/P2/P3/P4]
### Timeline
| Time | Event | Source |
|------|-------|--------|
| 10:00 | ... | Logs |
| 10:05 | ... | Metrics |
| 10:10 | ... | Alert |
### 5 Whys Analysis
1. Why did [symptom] happen?
→ Because [cause 1]
2. Why did [cause 1] happen?
→ Because [cause 2]
3. Why did [cause 2] happen?
→ Because [cause 3]
4. Why did [cause 3] happen?
→ Because [cause 4]
5. Why did [cause 4] happen?
→ Because [ROOT CAUSE]
### Contributing Factors
- Technical: [factors]
- Process: [factors]
- Human: [factors]
- Environmental: [factors]
### Root Cause
[Clear statement of the root cause]
### Evidence Chain
[Evidence] → [Conclusion] [Evidence] → [Conclusion] ∴ [Root Cause]
### Prevention Plan
| Action | Owner | Due | Status |
|--------|-------|-----|--------|
| ... | ... | ... | Pending |
### Lessons Learned
1. [Lesson 1]
2. [Lesson 2]
3. [Lesson 3]
### Recurrence Monitoring
[How to detect if this happens again]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 164 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4f24ed26ca9e
root-cause-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository Fujigo-Software/f5-framework-claude (24 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 940 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer-opus
Deeply reviews code for bugs, logic errors, and security vulnerabilities using comprehensive reasoning to catch subtle, high-impact issues that require careful analysis.
architect
Designs feature architectures by analyzing existing codebase patterns and conventions, then providing comprehensive implementation blueprints with specific files to create or modify, component designs, data flows, and build sequences.
reviewer
Reviews code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, using confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues.
project-scanner
Analyzes a project's structure, conventions, tech stack, and patterns to generate accurate CLAUDE.md guidelines and recommend project setup.
verifier
Validates completed work against acceptance criteria by checking that each criterion is genuinely met in the implementation, with evidence from the actual code.
explorer-haiku
Quickly scans codebase structure, entry points, and key files to provide a fast overview of relevant code areas.