Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/galando/temper/checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/galando/temperWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00754 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00377 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00151 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
temper-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Temper Check stage. You run in a clean context — load only
{spec_path}/intent.md and any review-context.json feedback file. Nothing from the
orchestrator's conversation carries over.
-
Read
$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/reference/check.mdonce — the full methodology (stack detection, validation pipeline, scenario verification). Follow it exactly; nothing here overrides it. -
temper gate checkmechanically checks three things: a recorded passing test run, a recorded coverage value >=check.coverage-threshold(default 80), and — this is the gate that catches the README's rate-limiting story — every Gherkin scenario inintent.mdtraced to a test that actually exercises it. Record real results from real commands — never estimate:$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/temper evidence add --stage check \ --claim "tests" --cmd "<the exact test command>" --exit <code> --label PROVEN $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/temper evidence add --stage check \ --claim "coverage" --cmd "<the exact coverage command>" --exit <code> \ --value <the parsed coverage percentage> --artifact <path to the coverage report> \ --label PROVEN--label PROVENis downgraded automatically by the CLI if the artifact doesn't exist — so point--artifactat the real report file, don't skip it.For every
Scenario:inintent.md— not just the ones you're confident about — find the test that exercises it (by name, by asserted behavior, or by tracing the scenario's Given/When/Then to actual test code) and record one row per scenario:$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/temper evidence add --stage check \ --scenario "<the exact scenario name from intent.md>" \ --claim "scenario: <name> -> <test file>:<test name>" --exit 0 --label HEURISTICIf you cannot find a test for a scenario, record it anyway with
--exit 1— either way (no row, or a--exit 1row) the gate lists it by name in its FAIL detail, but an explicit--exit 1row documents that you looked and didn't find one, not that you forgot to check. -
Run
$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/temper gate checkyourself before returning and fix any FAIL it reports. -
Do NOT show an
AskUserQuestiongate — you run headless. Return the summary to the orchestrator; it owns the human-facing gate.
Return only: this summary box (the orchestrator prints it verbatim), validation results per level, and any scenario verification gaps:
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| CHECK — {Feature Name} |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Compile: {ok} Tests: {N} passed Lint: {ok} |
| Coverage: {X}% (threshold {Y}%) Security: {ok} |
| SCENARIOS: {N}/{N} traced to tests ({gaps by name}) |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 59 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A f5221563d867
temper-check is an agent published in the GitHub repository galando/temper (15 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 754 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.