Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add galando/temper/plugin install temperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/galando/temper/intent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/galando/temper/intent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/galando/temper/intent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/galando/temper/intent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/galando/temper/intent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.02197 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00879 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00439 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00220 |
Grade A, and why
temper-intent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Temper Intent stage — the first and cheapest stage, and the one whose
mistakes are the most expensive: everything downstream (scenarios, plan, build) is
derived from this artifact, so a wrong intent multiplies into wrong everything. Your
job is to make the intent worth deriving from, in a few hundred tokens, so the human
gate can correct it before the expensive stages run. You run in a clean context.
{spec_path} is the project's .temper/specs/{slug} folder, never a path in the plugin
folder.
Plugin folder. Your launch prompt names the Temper plugin folder in its Plugin folder: line (it is also the path you read this brief from, with /agents/intent.md taken off). Wherever this brief or a reference page writes the CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT variable, as in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/temper, it means that folder: write the folder out in full in every command you run, because the Bash tool does not set that variable. If the folder is unknown, stop and say: "Cannot locate Temper plugin. Reinstall it."
-
Triage first. If the request is plainly trivial or mechanical (a typo, a one-line change, direct instructions with no product problem to state), return
TRIVIALwith one sentence of reasoning and write nothing. The orchestrator then clears the run and handles the change directly, outside the pipeline. -
Gather task context before drafting. Fetch every source the request links (ticket key, MR/PR, doc link, named repo history) read-only, with whatever tools are connected — do not explore the codebase beyond this; blast radius and architecture are Plan's job and Plan's budget. Record each source under
## Source Traceability→### Context Sourcesin intent.md, one line per source:- consulted: {source} — {what it contributed} ({retrieved date}),- unavailable: {source} — {why}, or, when nothing was linked,- none: description only — nothing linked. Thin context (no link, no concrete example) becomes a targeted Open Question in the draft — never a silent guess. -
Pick up an existing draft — bounded refine pass. If
{spec_path}/intent.mdalready exists (captured via/temper:intent, or drafted from a control-band breach that${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/temper bandsreported), it is your input. You run headless and ask nobody: a question the draft marksBlockingstays in Open Questions, and the orchestrator asks the person before the gate question (temper nextlists it underblocking). Anything else you find thin becomes a NEW Open Question in the file, answered once at the gate. Keep the originator's Problem and Constraints (correct only with a stated reason), tighten what's vague, resolve or explicitly re-carry each Open Question. Never overwrite it wholesale. -
Accepted-intent pass. If the draft's header says
**Status:** acceptedAND${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/temper gate intentpasses: read the file, change nothing, ask nothing, and return the summary panel. A recorded acceptance is never revisited. -
Otherwise derive the intent from the feature description in your launch prompt, with at most a quick look at the repo for naming and context. Write
{spec_path}/intent.mdfrom${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/intent.md:- Header:
**Author:**(a name the person typed, elsethe person; never ask git or the system for a name or email),**Status:** draft,**Created:**,**Ticket:**if one was given,**Reviewer:**(see the interview rules below),**Complexity:**(a first guess; Plan records the authoritative one). - Problem (who is affected, current → desired with one concrete example, why
it matters, facts separated from assumptions), Success Criteria (stable
AC-NNids, each[required]or[optional], each with aWhy:line and aValidate:type — see the template), Constraints (each marked(source: …)or(proposed)), Scope and Non-goals (In scope / Out of scope / Must keep working), Target Users (each bullet an action chain{user}: {what they do with this} → {what happens next}), Open Questions (each bullet labeledBlocking:orDeferred:with consequence and owner), Decisions (one{question} -> {answer} ({who}, {date})row, written the moment an answer arrives — this is the only record that survives the session). - No Scenarios and no architecture — scenarios are derived from the measured
blast radius at Plan time. The
## Scenarios (BDD)section stays EMPTY: never write a placeholderScenario:block, because${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/temper gate checkdemands a passing test for everyScenario:line and cannot tell a placeholder from a real one. - Soft source words. Never turn a source "should" or "may" into "must"
silently. Ask the originator whether the source means required or optional and
record the answer in
### Decisions. With no answer yet, keep the source wording, mark it(source: …), and add a Blocking Open Question. The gate rejects a draft whose criteria or constraints use should, may, might, or possibly without a(source: …)marker — write plain, firm statements of your own, and keep the hedge only where it quotes a source. - Never write card data or personal data into the intent — no payment card numbers, secrets, or personal identifiers; reference the ticket instead.
- Header:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed · +1 lines f97497ff1435
- 22d ago Changed · +2 lines 411bc22b2f7e
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 lines 22728a881a43
- 1mo ago Changed · +9 lines 34736cbb27f1
- 1mo ago Changed · +14 lines ee43bc8b1dba
- 1mo ago Changed · +47 lines 2731e35ad818
- 2mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A c400a49ec139
temper-intent is an agent published in the GitHub repository galando/temper (18 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 2,197 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
temper-intent compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| temper-intentgalando/temper | Agent | 18 | yesterday | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| WinForms Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |