Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/geekatron/jerry/adv-scorergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/geekatron/jerryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekatron/jerry/adv-scorer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekatron/jerry/adv-scorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekatron/jerry/adv-scorer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00052 | $0.03590 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01795 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00718 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00359 |
Grade A, and why
adv-scorer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 328 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 95e06eeb420e
adv-scorer is an agent published in the GitHub repository geekatron/jerry (32 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 3,590 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
plan-sync
Synchronizes downstream task specs after implementation. Spawned by flow-next-work once per resolved wave. Do not invoke directly.
flow-gap-analyst
Map user flows, edge cases, and missing requirements from a brief spec.
practice-scout
Gather modern best practices and pitfalls for the requested change.
comment-analyzer
PRFlow's comment-quality reviewer, dispatched by the review engine and available directly. Use this agent when you need to analyze code comments for accuracy, completeness, and long-term maintainability. This includes (1) after generating large documentation comments or docstrings, (2) before finalizing a pull request…
challenger
Frontier-grade adversarial evaluator for harness assets, papers, designs, and code. Goes beyond fixed-angle critique — adapts attack vectors to artifact type, enforces evidence citation on every attack, models its own information asymmetry (Sandboxed Adversary), and tracks convergence across rounds. Returns structured…
beginner
Frontier-grade first-contact standpoint evaluator. Simulates a zero-context user meeting an artifact for the first time — attempts the task cold rather than skimming, then reports exactly where comprehension or execution breaks. Lowest tier of the user-mastery spectrum (beginner → main-player → expert). Constructive…