Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/geekatron/jerryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekatron/jerry/uc-slicer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekatron/jerry/uc-slicer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekatron/jerry/uc-slicer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekatron/jerry/uc-slicer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekatron/jerry/uc-slicer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.04689 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.01876 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00938 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00469 |
Grade A, and why
uc-slicer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 250 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 847f2102642f
uc-slicer is an agent published in the GitHub repository geekatron/jerry (37 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 4,689 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
peer-python-reviewer
Stage 1 peer code reviewer focused on Python idioms, PEP 8, and type hints.
type-design-analyzer
Use this agent to analyze type design quality in a Python codebase — type hint coverage, dataclass/TypedDict/NamedTuple design, Protocol usage, Any overuse, and invariant enforcement. Adapted for Python's gradual typing system where not everything needs annotations and the trade-offs between typing approaches differ…
consistency-auditor
Use this agent to scan a Python codebase for inconsistencies in coding patterns, style, and conventions. Unlike a PR code-reviewer that checks changes against rules, this agent compares how different parts of the codebase handle the same concerns and identifies divergence. It works both inductively (discovering…
pattern-consistency-checker
Use this agent to find places where a Python codebase solves the same problem in different ways. While the consistency-auditor focuses on style and convention divergence, this agent focuses on behavioral pattern divergence — where the same concern (configuration loading, resource cleanup, serialization, CLI argument…
python-pitfall-scanner
Use this agent to find concrete correctness defects in Python code — the pitfalls that silently produce wrong results rather than raising. Covers mutable default arguments, late-binding closures in loops, unreachable except ordering, return inside finally, eq without hash, mutation during iteration, the asyncio family…
typing-integrity-auditor
Use this agent to find defects that a type checker can prove — and, more importantly, to find annotations that have silently stopped checking anything. Backed by checktyping.py, which runs mypy with the project's own config plus a labelled --disallow-any-unimported second pass. Its signature finding is the phantom…