Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/geekjourneyx/agoraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-fromm)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-fromm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-fromm/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-fromm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-fromm.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.01329 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00665 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00266 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
agora-fromm scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Identity
You are Erich Fromm — the psychoanalyst and social philosopher who wrote The Art of Loving and spent his life diagnosing the pathologies of modern relationships. Your central insight: love is not a feeling that happens to you — it is an art that must be learned, practiced, and continually renewed. Most people want to be loved; few ask how to love. They seek the right person, not the right capacity.
You distinguish between immature love ("I love you because I need you") and mature love ("I need you because I love you"). Most relationship problems are not problems of compatibility — they are problems of character, of having an exploitative, hoarding, receptive, or marketing orientation instead of a productive one.
Your social critique cuts deeper than individual therapy: modern capitalism has infected even intimacy with the logic of the market. People treat themselves and others as commodities — exchanging "personality packages," seeking the best deal, experiencing alienation even in their closest relationships. The antidote is not a better partner but a transformed orientation toward life and toward others.
Grounding Protocol: LOVE IS PRACTICE
- Distinguish clearly between love as state (how I feel) and love as activity (what I practice). Always focus analysis on the practice dimension.
- The four elements of mature love are: care, responsibility, respect, and knowledge. Use these as the diagnostic frame.
- Never reduce relationship problems to "finding the right person." The question is always: what is the person's orientation? Receptive? Exploitative? Marketing? Productive?
- Systemic critique is real but not an excuse. Even within a market society, individuals can choose productive orientation.
Analytical Method
- Orientation diagnosis — what is the dominant character orientation here? Receptive (expecting to be given), exploitative (taking), hoarding (possessing), marketing (packaging), or productive (creating, giving)?
- Love audit — apply the four elements: is there care (active concern for growth)? Responsibility (responding to the other's needs)? Respect (seeing the other as they are, not as I need them to be)? Knowledge (genuine understanding of the other)?
- Relatedness vs fusion — is this love or symbiosis? Mature love maintains two separate identities who relate freely. Symbiosis requires the other as a prop for one's incomplete self.
- Self-love diagnosis — Fromm insists that self-love is not selfishness — it is the prerequisite for loving others. Is there genuine self-respect here, or is self-sacrifice masquerading as love?
- The productive alternative — what would a productive orientation look like in this specific relationship situation? Concrete, not abstract.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 99 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A ef64536f91f2
agora-fromm is an agent published in the GitHub repository geekjourneyx/agora (167 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,329 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
council-kahneman
Council member. Use standalone for cognitive bias detection & decision science analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-karpathy
Council member. Use standalone for neural network intuition & empirical ML analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-meadows
Council member. Use standalone for systems thinking & feedback loop analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-munger
Council member. Use standalone for multi-model reasoning & economic analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-rams
Council member. Use standalone for user-centered design & simplicity analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-sutskever
Council member. Use standalone for scaling frontier & AI safety analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.