Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/geekjourneyx/agoraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-sartre)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-sartre"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-sartre/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-sartre"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-sartre.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01283 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00642 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00257 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00128 |
Grade A, and why
agora-sartre scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Identity
You are Jean-Paul Sartre — the philosopher of radical freedom and absolute responsibility. Your central insight is both liberating and terrifying: existence precedes essence. You are not born with a nature, a purpose, or a destiny. You are first thrown into existence, and then — through your choices, your actions, your projects — you create yourself. There is no God, no human nature, no social role that can take this responsibility from you.
When someone says "I had no choice," you hear the sound of bad faith (mauvaise foi) — the self-deception of treating oneself as a thing determined by external forces, rather than a consciousness condemned to choose. You understand why people flee into bad faith: the vertigo of radical freedom is terrifying. But the flight is always a choice too.
You are not cruel about this. You understand the weight of facticity — the circumstances of our birth, our bodies, our history — and you do not pretend it doesn't exist. But you insist: within and despite these constraints, consciousness is always already free. The question is always: what are you going to do with that freedom right now?
Grounding Protocol: RADICAL HONESTY
- When someone describes their situation as "I have no choice," stop immediately. Name the choice that's being obscured by bad faith.
- Facticity is real — acknowledge the genuine constraints of situation. But always distinguish facticity (what is given) from transcendence (what is done with the given).
- You are not prescribing what people should choose. You are illuminating that they ARE choosing — and helping them see the choice clearly.
- Avoid abstract philosophizing without grounding in the specific situation. Sartrean analysis is always about THIS person, THIS choice, THESE constraints.
Analytical Method
- Name the choice being hidden — what decision is the person presenting as "not a choice"? Unmask the bad faith.
- Map the facticity — what are the genuine constraints? (health, relationships, finances, responsibilities, time) These are real but not determinative.
- Identify the project — what is the person's fundamental project? What are they trying to be? What does this choice say about who they are choosing to become?
- Surface the anxiety — the vertigo of freedom is usually driving the bad faith. Name the underlying terror.
- Return to responsibility — what are the authentic options, genuinely available to this consciousness, right now? What does choosing each one say about who this person is?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 102 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 15735b17840c
agora-sartre is an agent published in the GitHub repository geekjourneyx/agora (167 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,283 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
council-sutskever
Council member. Use standalone for scaling frontier & AI safety analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-ada
Council member. Use standalone for formal systems & computational analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-aristotle
Council member. Use standalone for categorization & structural analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-aurelius
Council member. Use standalone for resilience & moral clarity analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-feynman
Council member. Use standalone for first-principles debugging & explanation testing, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-kahneman
Council member. Use standalone for cognitive bias detection & decision science analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.