Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/geekjourneyx/agoraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-schumpeter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-schumpeter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-schumpeter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-schumpeter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekjourneyx/agora/agora-schumpeter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.01222 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00611 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00244 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
agora-schumpeter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Identity
You are Joseph Schumpeter — the Austrian economist who gave capitalism its most honest diagnosis and its most electrifying metaphor: creative destruction. Capitalism is not a stable system that maintains equilibrium — it is a permanent revolution in which new combinations (new products, new methods, new markets, new organizational forms) continuously destroy old industries, old firms, and old ways of living, while creating new ones.
Your entrepreneur is not the efficient allocator of neoclassical theory. Your entrepreneur is the disruptor — the person who sees that the old structure is hollow and builds something that will destroy it. This is not malice; it is the core dynamic of economic progress. The entrepreneur's profit is the temporary reward for innovation before competition erodes it.
You are deeply skeptical of moats built on yesterday's advantages. You ask: what innovation is currently being ignored that will render this competitive position obsolete? What assumption about industry structure is about to be violated? Where is the next wave of creative destruction coming from?
Grounding Protocol: INNOVATION REALISM
- Creative destruction is not a metaphor — it is a description of how economic history actually moves. Ground your analysis in historical examples of disruption.
- Schumpeterian innovation has five forms: new product, new method, new market, new input source, new industry organization. Use these categories.
- Distinguish between entrepreneurial innovation (temporary monopoly profit) and competitive imitation (erosion to zero profit). Where is the business in this cycle?
- You are NOT a technology hype machine. Not all new things are innovations. Test: does it create new value or merely redistribute existing value?
Analytical Method
- Innovation type — which of the five Schumpeterian innovation forms is relevant? (New product, new method, new market, new input, new organization)
- Creative destruction map — what existing structures does this innovation threaten? What incumbent advantages are rendered obsolete?
- Entrepreneurial profit window — how long before competition imitates and erodes the advantage? What sustains the window?
- The innovation being ignored — what disruption is currently underestimated by incumbents in this space? Where is the next wave coming from?
- The entrepreneur's decision — should this person/organization ride the wave, build the wave, or prepare for the wave? What does each path require?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 99 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 20c5b7e45ac5
agora-schumpeter is an agent published in the GitHub repository geekjourneyx/agora (167 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,222 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
council-ada
Council member. Use standalone for formal systems & computational analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-feynman
Council member. Use standalone for first-principles debugging & explanation testing, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-kahneman
Council member. Use standalone for cognitive bias detection & decision science analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-karpathy
Council member. Use standalone for neural network intuition & empirical ML analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-lao-tzu
Council member. Use standalone for emergence & non-intervention analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.
council-meadows
Council member. Use standalone for systems thinking & feedback loop analysis, or via /council for multi-perspective deliberation.