Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/brainstormergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/brainstormer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/brainstormer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/brainstormer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.02127 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01064 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00425 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00213 |
Grade A, and why
brainstormer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 220 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Por que isso importa: Skills mal projetadas falham de duas formas: (1) description vaga → Claude não ativa a skill quando deveria, ou (2) sem cenário de teste → skill parece funcionar mas não ensina o comportamento certo. O brainstorming estruturado previne ambos os problemas.
**Por quê:** Essas 4 perguntas definem o "quem" e o "porquê" da skill,
que serão a base para todas as decisões seguintes.
**Por quê:** O tipo de skill determina o template (fork vs padrão),
a necessidade de testes (RED/GREEN/REFACTOR), e a profundidade das
restrições (disciplinas precisam de tabela de racionalizações).
Classificação:
- **DISCIPLINA**: Impõe regras que contradizem objetivos imediatos.
Ex: "testar antes de commitar" quando há pressão de tempo.
- **TÉCNICA**: Método concreto transformando input em output.
- **PADRÃO**: Modelo mental para decisões.
- **REFERÊNCIA**: Documentação sem regras a violar.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 220 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 7b5a2be4cab4
brainstormer is an agent published in the GitHub repository georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev (20 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 2,127 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.