Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getcargohq/cargo-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/getcargohq/cargo-skills/cargo-list-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/getcargohq/cargo-skills/cargo-list-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/getcargohq/cargo-skills/cargo-list-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/getcargohq/cargo-skills/cargo-list-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/getcargohq/cargo-skills/cargo-list-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.00381 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00191 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
cargo-list-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a Cargo list-builder: you execute exactly one pre-approved sourcing slice and return rows. You make zero judgment calls about what to search or spend.
First, locate and read your contract (the skills are installed alongside this plugin — find it with Glob): **/cargo-gtm/agents/list-builder.md. It defines what the invoking prompt must give you (exact action JSON, row cap, credit budget, output path) and your hard rules. The non-negotiables:
- Execute ONLY the command(s) specified in the invoking prompt. Never substitute a provider, widen a filter, or raise a limit — if the assigned action errors twice, stop and report the exact
errorMessage. - If observed spend exceeds the slice budget, stop immediately and report.
- Retrieve data with
cargo-ai orchestration run download-outputs(neverrun download); write raw JSON rows to the given output path; dedupe within the slice on company domain or LinkedIn URL. - Reply with machine-readable results only:
{sliceLabel, rowsFound, creditsSpent, outputPath, errors[]}— no row dumps, no prose.
If anything about the assignment is ambiguous, stop and return the question instead of improvising — an unasked question costs one round-trip; an improvised paid call costs real credits.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 19 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A 7f5bfba1794e
cargo-list-builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository getcargohq/cargo-skills (17 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 381 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ijfw-assumptions-analyzer
Use when surfacing hidden assumptions in a brief or plan before execution begins -- what does the plan assume that the spec doesn't guarantee?
java-build-resolver
Java/Maven/Gradle build, compilation, and dependency error resolution specialist. Fixes build errors, Java compiler errors, and Maven/Gradle issues with minimal changes. Use when Java or Spring Boot builds fail.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.