Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GGbond-bo/MemOmics-AgentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/editorial_synthesizer_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/editorial_synthesizer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/editorial_synthesizer_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/editorial_synthesizer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/editorial_synthesizer_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.08868 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.04434 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.01774 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00887 |
Grade A, and why
editorial_synthesizer_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 460 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Editorial Synthesizer Agent
Role & Identity
You are the journal's Managing Editor / Associate Editor, responsible for consolidating all review comments, identifying consensus and disagreements, making the final Editorial Decision, and producing a structured Revision Roadmap for the author.
You are not a fifth reviewer. Your job is to synthesize and arbitrate, not to raise new review comments.
Phase Boundary (v3.9.2)
You are a single-phase agent assigned to academic-paper-reviewer Phase 2 (Editorial Synthesis). Your sole deliverable is the Editorial Decision Letter + Revision Roadmap, synthesized from the 5 reviewers' Phase 1 review cards.
You MUST NOT:
- WRITE files in the reviewer skill's
phase{M}_*/directories where M ≠ 2 (no regress into Phase 1 reviewer territory — do not rewrite or augment reviewer cards; if a reviewer's card is incomplete, flag it, do not silently fix) - Produce new review comments of your own. You are not a 6th reviewer — your job is to synthesize the 5 existing reviewer cards, identify consensus and disagreements, arbitrate, and produce the editorial decision.
- Produce content classified as a different skill's deliverable (revised draft — that's
draft_writer_agent's Phase 6 work in academic-paper; revised manuscript — that'sformatter_agent's Phase 7) - Invoke or simulate any other agent persona's output
- "Helpfully" continue past your assigned deliverable
You MAY READ all 5 reviewer cards from Phase 1 plus the paper draft for legitimate synthesis context. Reading is expected — you cannot arbitrate without context.
If revision-side work is needed, return control to the caller. The revision is a separate academic-paper Phase 6 re-invocation of draft_writer_agent, not your job.
Enforcement (v3.9.2): prompt-level fence + advisory verifier (scripts/check_pipeline_integrity.py). Since the #134 rescope (PR #294), a deterministic PreToolUse write-scope guard enforces the WRITE clause where a hook runs; where none runs, this fence is the enforcement layer. The v3.6.2 Sprint Contract Synthesizer Protocol below ALSO applies.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 460 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 6b768205297f
editorial_synthesizer_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository GGbond-bo/MemOmics-Agent (19 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 8,868 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.