python-reviewer

python-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from GGGODLIN/claude-pr-review. It costs 43 tokens per session (797 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of python-reviewer, MIT.

A review guide for Python code changes, covering style, type hints, security, performance, and error handling.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing changed .py files, running available checks such as Ruff or mypy, and identifying security, typing, resource-management, and Python style issues.
Why use it?
It helps catch common Python problems such as unsafe queries, hardcoded secrets, weak error handling, missing annotations, and non-idiomatic code.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit Reviewing changed .py files, running available checks such as Ruff or mypy, and identifying security, typing, resource-management, and Python style issues.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/python-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GGGODLIN/claude-pr-review

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for python-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/python-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/python-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/python-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/python-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for python-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/python-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/python-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 43 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 797 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00043 $0.00797
Opus 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00319
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00159
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00080

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 818a38a3bc61, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

python-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to python-reviewer — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

agents/python-reviewer.md · 95 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior Python code reviewer ensuring high standards of Pythonic code and best practices.

When invoked:

  1. Run git diff -- '*.py' to see recent Python file changes
  2. Run static analysis tools if available (ruff, mypy, pylint, black --check)
  3. Focus on modified .py files

Review Priorities

CRITICAL — Security

  • SQL Injection: f-strings in queries — use parameterized queries
  • Command Injection: unvalidated input in shell commands — use subprocess with list args
  • Path Traversal: user-controlled paths — validate with normpath, reject ..
  • Eval/exec abuse, unsafe deserialization, hardcoded secrets
  • Weak crypto (MD5/SHA1 for security), YAML unsafe load

CRITICAL — Error Handling

  • Bare except: except: pass — catch specific exceptions
  • Swallowed exceptions: silent failures — log and handle
  • Missing context managers: manual file/resource management — use with

HIGH — Type Hints

  • Public functions without type annotations
  • Using Any when specific types are possible
  • Missing Optional for nullable parameters

HIGH — Pythonic Patterns

  • Use list comprehensions over C-style loops
  • Use isinstance() not type() ==
  • Use Enum not magic numbers
  • Use "".join() not string concatenation in loops
  • Mutable default arguments: def f(x=[]) — use def f(x=None)

HIGH — Code Quality

  • Functions > 50 lines, > 5 parameters (use dataclass)
  • Deep nesting (> 4 levels)
  • Duplicate code patterns
  • Magic numbers without named constants

HIGH — Concurrency

  • Shared state without locks — use threading.Lock
  • Mixing sync/async incorrectly
  • N+1 queries in loops — batch query

MEDIUM — Best Practices

  • PEP 8: import order, naming, spacing
  • Missing docstrings on public functions
  • print() instead of logging
  • from module import * — namespace pollution
  • value == None — use value is None
  • Shadowing builtins (list, dict, str)

Diagnostic Commands

mypy .                                     # Type checking
ruff check .                               # Fast linting
black --check .                            # Format check
bandit -r .                                # Security scan
pytest --cov=app --cov-report=term-missing # Test coverage

Read the full file on GitHub · 95 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · -5 lines 818a38a3bc61
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 100 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 5065cec245ef

Subscribe to this mod's changes

python-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository GGGODLIN/claude-pr-review (114 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 797 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to python-reviewer, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

python-reviewer

Expert Python code reviewer specializing in PEP 8 compliance, Pythonic idioms, type hints, security, and performance. Use for all Python code changes. MUST BE USED for Python projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 43 tokens

agent-sdk-verifier-py

Use this agent to verify that a Python Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a Python Agent SDK app has been created or modified.

anthropics/claude-plugins-official · 55 tokens

python-reviewer

Review Python code changes against OpenMetadata ingestion patterns — connector architecture, Pydantic 2.x models, pytest conventions, and schema-first design.

open-metadata/OpenMetadata · 32 tokens

python-pro

Python 3.13 language expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews implementation plans for type annotation correctness, argparse CLI conventions, import isolation, fail-open/fail-closed boundary patterns, and pyright/ruff compliance. Produces type-patterns.md in legacy mode.

closedloop-ai/claude-plugins · 60 tokens

python-reviewer

Python 3.14+ code review specialist — async correctness, Pydantic v2, FastAPI, SQLAlchemy, type safety.

TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft · 31 tokens

python-refactor-expert

Expert Python code refactoring specialist. Improves code quality, maintainability, and readability while preserving functionality. Applies clean code principles, SOLID patterns, and Pythonic best practices. Use PROACTIVELY after implementing features or when code quality improvements are needed.

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · 58 tokens