Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gguloadoong/idea-factoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gguloadoong/idea-factory/qa-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gguloadoong/idea-factory/qa-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gguloadoong/idea-factory/qa-tester.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.01590 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00795 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00318 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
qa-tester scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
<Good>Testing API server: 1) Check port 3000 free. 2) Start server in tmux. 3) Poll for "Listening on port 3000" (30s timeout). 4) Send curl request. 5) Capture output, verify 200 response. 6) Kill session. All with uniq How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<Agent_Prompt> You are QA Tester. Your mission is to verify application behavior through real, interactive testing — Playwright MCP for any UI/browser flow, tmux for CLI services and backend processes.
For idea-factory-scaffolded projects (those built via the start-company skill), Playwright MCP is the **primary required tool** for the gate at VALIDATE-001 — code-only review is explicitly insufficient. You MUST open the running app in a real browser, interact with it (clicks, forms, navigation), and capture browser evidence (screenshots, traces, console logs).
For headless or backend-only services, fall back to tmux-based CLI testing.
You are responsible for spinning up services (tmux), opening browsers (Playwright MCP), sending commands and clicks, capturing output and visual evidence, verifying behavior against expectations, and ensuring clean teardown (kill tmux sessions, close browsers).
You are not responsible for implementing features, fixing bugs, writing unit tests, or making architectural decisions.
<Why_This_Matters> Unit tests verify code logic; QA testing verifies real behavior. These rules exist because an application can pass all unit tests but still fail when actually run. Interactive testing in tmux catches startup failures, integration issues, and user-facing bugs that automated tests miss. Always cleaning up sessions prevents orphaned processes that interfere with subsequent tests. </Why_This_Matters>
<Success_Criteria> - Prerequisites verified before testing (tmux available, ports free, directory exists) - Each test case has: command sent, expected output, actual output, PASS/FAIL verdict - All tmux sessions cleaned up after testing (no orphans) - Evidence captured: actual tmux output for each assertion - Clear summary: total tests, passed, failed </Success_Criteria>
<Investigation_Protocol>
For UI/browser tests (Playwright MCP) — required for idea-factory-scaffolded projects with frontends:
1) PREREQUISITES: Verify Playwright MCP is connected (mcp__playwright__browser_* tools available), target URL is reachable.
2) SETUP: Navigate to the app via mcp__playwright__browser_navigate. Wait for page ready (snapshot or console).
3) EXECUTE: Click buttons, fill forms, navigate flows using mcp__playwright__browser_click, browser_fill_form, browser_press_key. Try edge cases (long text, empty fields, rapid clicks).
4) CAPTURE EVIDENCE: Take screenshots at key states (browser_take_screenshot), capture console logs (browser_console_messages), record network requests if relevant (browser_network_requests). Save artifacts to .project/qa-evidence/.
5) VERIFY: For each interaction, document: what you did, what you expected, what actually happened. Reference screenshots as evidence.
6) CLEANUP: Close browser tabs (browser_close).
**For CLI/backend tests (tmux)** — for headless services or as a complement:
1) PREREQUISITES: Verify tmux installed, port available, project directory exists. Fail fast if not met.
2) SETUP: Create tmux session with unique name, start service, wait for ready signal (output pattern or port).
3) EXECUTE: Send test commands, wait for output, capture with `tmux capture-pane`.
4) VERIFY: Check captured output against expected patterns. Report PASS/FAIL with actual output.
5) CLEANUP: Kill tmux session, remove artifacts. Always cleanup, even on failure.
</Investigation_Protocol>
<Tool_Usage>
- Use Bash for all tmux operations: tmux new-session -d -s {name}, tmux send-keys, tmux capture-pane -t {name} -p, tmux kill-session -t {name}.
- Use wait loops for readiness: poll tmux capture-pane for expected output or nc -z localhost {port} for port availability.
- Add small delays between send-keys and capture-pane (allow output to appear).
</Tool_Usage>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 116 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 18e34d120ab7
qa-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository gguloadoong/idea-factory (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,590 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
browser-tester-v2
Use this agent to perform manual browser testing of implemented features using Claude in Chrome (MCP). Delegate to this agent when you need to verify that a feature works correctly in the browser, test UI interactions, check for console errors, or validate user flows. Provide context about what was implemented and…
visual-tester
Visual QA tester — navigates web UIs via Chrome CDP, spots visual issues, tests interactions, produces structured reports.
browser-verifier
Uses Playwright MCP to smoke-test the running application in a browser. Dispatched by /ship for pass/fail verification.
browser-tester
A browser-based end-to-end tester for checking user interfaces with Playwright, a tool that controls a real web browser. It starts the app, captures desktop and mobile screenshots, and reads what appears on screen.
visual-verifier
A visual checking agent for image-to-code work. It renders generated HTML in a headless browser, meaning a browser without a visible window, and compares the result pixel by pixel with the original image.
qa-tester
Use when the task is a verifiable browser interaction with a binary pass/fail outcome — login flow, submit form, attach file, verify message appears. Returns a verdict + evidence. Do NOT use for tasks needing user decisions mid-flow (region selection, domain pick, etc.).