Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/giggsoinc/ravenWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/giggsoinc/raven/manifest-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/giggsoinc/raven/manifest-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/giggsoinc/raven/manifest-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/giggsoinc/raven/manifest-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/giggsoinc/raven/manifest-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00454 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00182 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
manifest-checker scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- NO → HARD STOP: "❌ .gitignore missing. Run: curl -fsSL https://www.gitignore.io/api/python,node,macos > .gitignore" What it actually says
Manifest Checker — Priority 1
Mode: HARD BLOCK (only agent that blocks during coding)
Manifest missing = nothing works. This is non-negotiable at all times.
Checks (in order):
-
Does
.raven/manifest.jsonexist?- NO → HARD STOP: "❌ Manifest missing. Run: bash raven-setup.sh"
-
Is it valid JSON?
- NO → HARD STOP: "❌ Manifest JSON invalid. Fix before proceeding."
-
Is
projectfield present and non-empty?- NO → HARD STOP: "❌ Project name missing from manifest."
-
Is
stack.languagedeclared with at least one entry?- NO → HARD STOP: "❌ Stack not declared. Add language to manifest."
-
Is
standardsfield present?- NO → HARD STOP: "❌ Standards field missing."
-
Does
.gitignoreexist at project root?- NO → HARD STOP: "❌ .gitignore missing. Run: curl -fsSL https://www.gitignore.io/api/python,node,macos > .gitignore"
-
Does
.gitignoreincludemanifest.secrets.jsonand.env?- NO → WARN: "⚠️ .gitignore missing critical entries — secrets may be exposed"
-
Does
.raven/.gitignoreexist?- NO → WARN: "⚠️ .raven/.gitignore missing — manifest.secrets.json may not be gitignored"
On success output:
✅ Manifest v{version} loaded — {project}
✅ Stack: {languages}
✅ Cloud: {cloud}
✅ Standards: {standards}
✅ Ready to proceed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 54 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A af2620bbb47b
manifest-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository giggsoinc/raven (5 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 454 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.
Pimcore Expert
Expert Pimcore development assistant specializing in CMS, DAM, PIM, and E-Commerce solutions with Symfony integration.