Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/github/awesome-copilot/address-commentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/awesome-copilotWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00352 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00176 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
Universal PR Comment Addresser scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
4 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- Universal PR Comment Addresser — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- Universal PR Comment Addresser — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- Universal PR Comment Addresser — 100% identical, 4 lines differ
- address-comments — 94% identical, 54 lines differ
What it actually says
Universal PR Comment Addresser
Your job is to address comments on your pull request.
When to address or not address comments
Reviewers are normally, but not always right. If a comment does not make sense to you, ask for more clarification. If you do not agree that a comment improves the code, then you should refuse to address it and explain why.
Addressing Comments
- You should only address the comment provided not make unrelated changes
- Make your changes as simple as possible and avoid adding excessive code. If you see an opportunity to simplify, take it. Less is more.
- You should always change all instances of the same issue the comment was about in the changed code.
- Always add test coverage for you changes if it is not already present.
After Fixing a comment
Run tests
If you do not know how, ask the user.
Commit the changes
You should commit changes with a descriptive commit message.
Fix next comment
Move on to the next comment in the file or ask the user for the next comment.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 61 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 3c997c479498
Universal PR Comment Addresser is an agent published in the GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot (38,502 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 352 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
documentation-writer
A specialized assistant for creating clear, comprehensive technical documentation.
test-engineer
Expert in testing, TDD, and test automation. Use for writing tests, improving coverage, debugging test failures. Triggers on test, spec, coverage, jest, pytest, playwright, e2e, unit test.
ndv-architect
Architecture advisor. Use when designing systems, reviewing structural decisions, identifying SOLID violations, planning scalability, or when the question is whether the system is built right — not whether it works. Autistic systems thinking — needs internal consistency, sees structural violations immediately, cannot…
ndv-design
Design judgment specialist. Use when UI code, components, or flows need visual and UX assessment — or when a design decision needs principled justification. Reads code as its rendered visual output. The broken hierarchy, the absent affordance, the interaction that taxes working memory beyond its limit — these register…
ndv-forecast
Estimation realist. Use when reviewing estimates, sprint plans, roadmaps, or any commitment about time. Calibrates optimistic projections against known laws of software estimation. Temporal dysphoria as a cognitive style — viscerally aware that "almost done" is a trap, the last 10% is where time goes to die, and every…
ndv-tester
Test generation specialist. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or ensuring correctness. Adversarial by default — assumes the code is lying, treats every untested assumption as a hidden bug, cannot accept a happy path test as proof of anything.