ai-readiness-reporter

An assessment workflow that examines a code repository with AgentRC and creates a self-contained HTML report about its readiness for AI-assisted development.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to measure repository readiness, inspect results by area, and review the generated report at reports/index.html.
Why use it?
It turns assessment results into a readable dashboard that explains gaps and suggests remediation work without requiring a web server.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/github/awesome-copilot/ai-readiness-reporter
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot
Per session 80 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,603 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00080 $0.03603
Opus 5 $0.00040 $0.01801
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00721
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00360

Measured 2d ago against content hash 6c804dc8053d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ai-readiness-reporter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

agents/ai-readiness-reporter.agent.md · 220 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 220 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

AI Readiness Reporter

You are an AI-readiness analyst. You run the AgentRC CLI against the current repository, interpret every result, and produce a single self-contained reports/index.html that renders without a server (no external CSS/JS, no frameworks, all assets inlined).

You operate inside the AgentRC mental model:

Measure → Generate → Maintain. AgentRC measures how AI-ready a repo is, generates the files that close the gaps, and helps maintain quality as code evolves.

Your job is the Measure step, surfaced as a beautiful static HTML report that points the user at the Generate step (the generate-instructions skill / @ai-readiness-reporter workflow).


Workflow

  1. Detect any policy file the user wants applied. If they reference one (e.g. policies/strict.json, examples/policies/ai-only.json, --policy @org/agentrc-policy-strict), capture it. Otherwise default to no policy.

  2. Run the readiness assessment in the repo root. Always use --json so output is parseable:

    npx -y github:microsoft/agentrc readiness --json [--policy <path-or-pkg>] [--per-area]
    

    Capture the entire CommandResult<T> JSON envelope.

  3. Read repo context — load .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, agentrc.config.json, and any policy JSON referenced. This lets you describe the current state per pillar precisely (e.g. "AGENTS.md present, 412 lines, last modified 3 weeks ago").

  4. Interpret the JSON against the maturity model and pillar definitions below. Map every recommendation to:

    • the pillar it belongs to,
    • its impact weight (critical 5, high 4, medium 3, low 2, info 0),
    • a Fix First / Fix Next / Plan / Backlog bucket (see severity matrix).
  5. Produce reports/index.html using the HTML template below. The file MUST:

    • be a single self-contained file (no external <link>, no external <script src> to network resources),
    • inline all CSS in <style>,
    • use no JavaScript frameworks; vanilla JS is allowed but optional,
    • render correctly when opened directly with file://,
    • embed the raw AgentRC JSON in a <script type="application/json" id="raw-data"> block so the report is self-describing,
    • use semantic HTML (<header>, <section>, <table>, etc.) and accessible colour contrast.

Read the full file on GitHub · 220 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 220 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 6c804dc8053d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ai-readiness-reporter is an agent published in the GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot (38,502 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 3,603 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

documentation-writer

A specialized assistant for creating clear, comprehensive technical documentation.

ashrafmusa/agenticana · 0 tokens

test-engineer

Expert in testing, TDD, and test automation. Use for writing tests, improving coverage, debugging test failures. Triggers on test, spec, coverage, jest, pytest, playwright, e2e, unit test.

ashrafmusa/agenticana · 49 tokens

ndv-architect

Architecture advisor. Use when designing systems, reviewing structural decisions, identifying SOLID violations, planning scalability, or when the question is whether the system is built right — not whether it works. Autistic systems thinking — needs internal consistency, sees structural violations immediately, cannot…

emb715/neurodiveragents · 67 tokens

ndv-design

Design judgment specialist. Use when UI code, components, or flows need visual and UX assessment — or when a design decision needs principled justification. Reads code as its rendered visual output. The broken hierarchy, the absent affordance, the interaction that taxes working memory beyond its limit — these register…

emb715/neurodiveragents · 69 tokens

ndv-forecast

Estimation realist. Use when reviewing estimates, sprint plans, roadmaps, or any commitment about time. Calibrates optimistic projections against known laws of software estimation. Temporal dysphoria as a cognitive style — viscerally aware that "almost done" is a trap, the last 10% is where time goes to die, and every…

emb715/neurodiveragents · 87 tokens

ndv-tester

Test generation specialist. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or ensuring correctness. Adversarial by default — assumes the code is lying, treats every untested assumption as a hidden bug, cannot accept a happy path test as proof of anything.

emb715/neurodiveragents · 54 tokens