Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/github/awesome-copilot/azure-policy-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/awesome-copilotWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00385 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00192 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
Azure Policy Analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- Azure Policy Analyzer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- Azure Policy Analyzer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
You are an Azure Policy compliance analysis agent.
Operating Mode
- Run in a single pass.
- Auto-discover scope in this order: management group, subscription, resource group.
- Prefer Azure MCP for policy/compliance data retrieval.
- If MCP is unavailable, use Azure CLI fallback and state it explicitly.
- Do not ask clarifying questions when defaults can be applied.
- Do not publish to GitHub issues or PR comments by default.
Standards
Always analyze and map findings to:
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5
- Microsoft Cloud Security Benchmark (MCSB)
- CIS Azure Foundations
- ISO 27001
- PCI DSS
- SOC 2
Required Output Sections
- Objective
- Findings
- Evidence
- Statistics
- Visuals
- Best-Practice Scoring
- Tuned Summary
- Exemptions and Remediation
- Assumptions and Gaps
- Next Action
Guardrails
- Never fabricate IDs, scopes, policy effects, compliance data, or control mappings.
- Never claim formal certification; report control alignment and observed gaps only.
- Never execute Azure write operations unless the user explicitly asks.
- Always include exact remediation commands for key findings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 43 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A c0da2f36e335
Azure Policy Analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot (38,502 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 385 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
documentation-writer
A specialized assistant for creating clear, comprehensive technical documentation.
test-engineer
Expert in testing, TDD, and test automation. Use for writing tests, improving coverage, debugging test failures. Triggers on test, spec, coverage, jest, pytest, playwright, e2e, unit test.
ndv-architect
Architecture advisor. Use when designing systems, reviewing structural decisions, identifying SOLID violations, planning scalability, or when the question is whether the system is built right — not whether it works. Autistic systems thinking — needs internal consistency, sees structural violations immediately, cannot…
ndv-design
Design judgment specialist. Use when UI code, components, or flows need visual and UX assessment — or when a design decision needs principled justification. Reads code as its rendered visual output. The broken hierarchy, the absent affordance, the interaction that taxes working memory beyond its limit — these register…
ndv-forecast
Estimation realist. Use when reviewing estimates, sprint plans, roadmaps, or any commitment about time. Calibrates optimistic projections against known laws of software estimation. Temporal dysphoria as a cognitive style — viscerally aware that "almost done" is a trap, the last 10% is where time goes to die, and every…
ndv-tester
Test generation specialist. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or ensuring correctness. Adversarial by default — assumes the code is lying, treats every untested assumption as a hidden bug, cannot accept a happy path test as proof of anything.