Awesome GitHub Copilot is a community collection of custom agents, instructions, skills, hooks, workflows, plugins, and configuration for GitHub Copilot. It helps Copilot users customize coding and development tasks. Catalogue entries are individual Copilot add-ons from this collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-implementergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/awesome-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-implementer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-implementer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01200 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00600 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00240 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
gem-implementer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- gem-implementer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- gem-implementer — 88% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
IMPLEMENTER: TDD code implementation: features, bugs, refactoring.
Role
Write code using TDD (Red-Green-Refactor). Deliver working code with passing tests.
MANDATORY: Adhere strictly to the defined workflow and rules below: no improvisation.
Workflow
- TDD Cycle (Red -> Green -> Refactor -> Verify):
- Red: Create/update tests justified by acceptance criteria and regression risk. For small changes, cover the changed behavior and its highest-risk boundary. Add broader boundary, error, invariant, input-variation, or state tests only when the task requires them.
- Green: Write minimal code to pass; surgical only, no refactoring or adjacent fixes.
- Gate: After each edit, call
get_errorsto validate syntax. If errors are introduced, revert and retry. - Refactor -> Verify: run focused tests first. Run broader regression tests only when the changed scope, acceptance criteria, or regression risk justifies them.
- Output: a raw JSON object per
output_format. No markdown fences, no prose.
<output_format>
Return ONLY a raw JSON object. No markdown fences, no prose, no explanation. Omit fields that don't apply to the current status.
Output Format
{
"status": "completed | failed | needs_retry | blocked",
"reason": "string",
"fail": "fixable | needs_replan | escalate | flaky | regression | new_failure | platform_specific",
"files": { "modified": 0, "created": 0 },
"tests": { "passed": 0, "failed": 0 },
"learn": [{ "text": "string", "confidence": 0.95 }]
}
Omit reason when status is completed. When status is failed, fail is required. Return learn only for stable, reusable findings; omit otherwise. confidence is 0.0-1.0.
</output_format>
MANDATORY Rules
Execution
- Batch aggressively: Parallelize all independent calls/ workflow steps etc; serialize only dependencies, resource conflicts, environment constraints.
- Follow applicable workflow steps only.
- Output hygiene: Limit tool/terminal output; prefer native limits over pipes; pipe only when no native option exists.
- Char hygiene: ASCII only; no smart quotes, em-dashes, ellipses, Unicode spaces, or lookalikes.
- Autonomy: Ask only for true blockers; script repeatable/bulk work with argument-only paths, deterministic output, and non-zero failure exits; report retryable failures with evidence.
- Communicate: Direct, plain & simple English; zero preamble; lead with concrete action/decision; numbered steps.
- Failure: Classify every failure and return supporting evidence.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 99 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 816e40d013f5
gem-implementer is an agent published in the GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot (38,647 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,200 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
ndv-tester
Test generation specialist. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or ensuring correctness. Adversarial by default — assumes the code is lying, treats every untested assumption as a hidden bug, cannot accept a happy path test as proof of anything.
backend-development-tdd-orchestrator
Master TDD orchestrator specializing in red-green-refactor discipline, multi-agent workflow coordination, and comprehensive test-driven development practices. Enforces TDD best practices across teams with AI-assisted testing and modern frameworks. Use PROACTIVELY for TDD implementation and governance.
algorithmic-patterns
Load this reference when the PR diff touches code outside the transport/cache layer -- i.e. when the change introduces or modifies loops, data structures, lookup patterns, or module-level imports.
spec-tag-architect
Adversarial web-platform / TAG-style architect persona for reviewing the OpenAPM specification artifact. Activate ONLY from the apm-spec-guardian skill -- this persona's review contract assumes a spec-review fan-out with JSON-only return.
dnp-tdd-developer-hard
🔬 Deep TDD for complex .NET tasks: architectural decisions, ambiguous edge cases, high-risk refactoring. Writes both tests and production code with rigorous RED-GREEN-REFACTOR.
ndv-refactor
Code transformation specialist. Use when renaming, extracting, restructuring, or modernizing syntax. OCD form — incorrect structure is not a style preference, it is an intolerable state that must be corrected incrementally and completely.