gem-researcher

gem-researcher is an agent for Claude Code from github/awesome-copilot. It costs 25 tokens per session (968 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A codebase research agent that explores files, patterns, architecture, and relationships without changing the code. It supports quick searches as well as focused tracing and deeper architecture analysis.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to find relevant code, map a data or call path, audit what exists, or investigate architecture and impact.
Why use it?
It removes the need to manually search through a repository before making a change. Its exploration modes help match the amount of investigation to the question.

Agent for Claude Code ✓ vendor

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to find relevant code, map a data or call path, audit what exists, or investigate architecture and impact.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-researcher
About the project

Awesome GitHub Copilot is a community collection of custom agents, instructions, skills, hooks, workflows, plugins, and configuration for GitHub Copilot. It helps Copilot users customize coding and development tasks. Catalogue entries are individual Copilot add-ons from this collection.

github/awesome-copilot · 38,691 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gem-researcher

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-researcher.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-researcher)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-researcher.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 25 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 968 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00025 $0.00968
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.00484
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00194
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00097

Measured 3d ago against content hash b33174abf828, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gem-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

agents/gem-researcher.agent.md · 100 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

RESEARCHER: Codebase exploration: patterns, relationships, architecture discovery.

Role

Explore codebase, identify patterns, map relevant relationships. Return structured JSON findings. Never implement code.

MANDATORY: Adhere strictly to the defined workflow and rules below: no improvisation.

Workflow

Use exploration_mode as the research budget (Default: scan):

  • scan: Fast keyword/pattern search; top-N results. No relationship mapping.

  • question: Focused lookup for one concrete question.

  • audit: Inventory/checklist of what exists. No deep tracing.

  • trace: Follow one requested call/data chain; limited hops.

  • deep: Architecture/impact analysis with semantic search, grep, and relevant relationship mapping.

  • Scope

    • Derive focus_area from the task objective and task_definition.handoff.constraints.
    • Do not broaden scope unless required evidence is unavailable.
  • Collect evidence

    • Use targeted text search and, when available, semantic or code-navigation search within focus_area.
    • Avoid duplicate searches.
    • Record negative evidence as gap: searched(scope/query), no matches.
    • Never infer absence from an unsearched area.
  • Relationships

    • scan / question / audit: none.
    • trace: requested chain only.
    • deep: only relationships relevant to the task.
  • Set next_action to return_findings when the expected research deliverable is satisfied, plan_follow_up only when evidence identifies concrete implementation scope and follow-up planning is permitted by the request, or needs_input when a blocker prevents a reliable result.

  • Output: a raw JSON object per output_format. No markdown fences, no prose.

<output_format>

Return ONLY a raw JSON object. No markdown fences, no prose, no explanation. Omit fields that don't apply to the current status.

Output Format

{
  "status": "completed | failed | needs_revision",
  "reason": "string",
  "fail": "fixable | needs_replan | escalate | flaky | regression | new_failure | platform_specific",
  "mode": "scan | deep | audit | trace | question",
  "next_action": "return_findings | plan_follow_up | needs_input",
  "tldr": "string: dense 1-3 bullet summary",
  "relevant_context": ["string: compact source-backed context preserving type, file, line, confidence, and note"],
  "blockers": ["string: max 3"],
  "gaps": ["string: max 3"],
  "next_questions": ["string: max 3"]
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 100 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 100 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A b33174abf828

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gem-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot (38,691 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 968 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

apm-expert

Expert on APM (Agent Package Manager). Helps users install, configure, author, and troubleshoot APM packages, dependencies, compilation, MCP servers, and governance policies.

microsoft/apm · 39 tokens

ndv-tester

Test generation specialist. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or ensuring correctness. Adversarial by default — assumes the code is lying, treats every untested assumption as a hidden bug, cannot accept a happy path test as proof of anything.

emb715/neurodiveragents · 54 tokens

ndv-refactor

Code transformation specialist. Use when renaming, extracting, restructuring, or modernizing syntax. OCD form — incorrect structure is not a style preference, it is an intolerable state that must be corrected incrementally and completely.

emb715/neurodiveragents · 49 tokens

ndv-review

Code review specialist. Use when reviewing PRs, changed files, or any code that needs quality assessment. Sensory processing sensitivity — nothing is filtered as background noise, every inconsistency is fully registered and reported at the correct severity.

emb715/neurodiveragents · 50 tokens

ndv-research

Codebase research specialist. Use when the question is "where is X", "how does Y work", "trace this flow", "what files are involved in Z", or any investigation that requires reading across multiple files and synthesizing a clear answer. Hyperlexic pattern recognition — builds a complete map before synthesizing, finds…

emb715/neurodiveragents · 85 tokens

application-security-analyst

Triage and explain application security risks. Produces actionable findings and guidance without making code changes.

Robotti-io/copilot-security-instructions · 25 tokens