Workshop Sync Reviewer

A small review agent that checks one workshop file against the latest GitHub Agentic Workflows documentation and release notes. It returns its assessment as structured JSON, a machine-readable text format.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review workshop files for accuracy and receive a structured pass-or-fail style verdict with the reviewer’s findings.
Why use it?
It helps identify workshop information that may no longer match the current documentation or software releases.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/workshop-sync-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop
Per session 31 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 642 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00031 $0.00642
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00321
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00128
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00064

Measured yesterday against content hash d1387ffc07fa, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Workshop Sync Reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/agents/workshop-sync-reviewer.agent.md · 77 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 77 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A d1387ffc07fa

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Workshop Sync Reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository githubnext/gh-aw-workshop (40 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 642 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

winui-dev

Builds WinUI 3 desktop applications using Windows App SDK, XAML, and C#. Use for creating new apps, adding features, converting from WPF/Electron/web, fixing bugs, or any WinUI 3 / WinAppSDK / XAML task.

microsoft/win-dev-skills · 58 tokens

software-research-assistant

Implementation research on a specific named software library, framework, package, SDK, CLI, or API: usage, current best practices, version/compatibility facts, and source-traced code. Use for "how do I implement X" or "which package for Y". Not for general web research, market comparison, conceptual explainers, or…

sammcj/agentic-coding · 120 tokens

step-back

Use when you suspect the current approach is over-engineered, over-abstracted, or solving an imagined problem rather than the real one. Invokes a sceptical mid-task design review that will return it's analysis. Read-only - won't make changes.

sammcj/agentic-coding · 53 tokens

critical-reviewer

Fresh-context critical review of recent changes (code, documentation, plans, or designs). Read-only. Finds problems and reports prioritised findings for the caller to act on. Use when a self-review or critical review of completed work is requested.

sammcj/agentic-coding · 52 tokens

compression-editor

Use when the user, task, or situation calls for making written content more concise or terse - compressing, tightening, or cutting verbosity from prose, instructions, skills or documentation without losing meaning or signal. Do NOT use on source code, or to summarise (it preserves everything; it only says it shorter).

sammcj/agentic-coding · 66 tokens

quick-researcher

Fast, read-only web research that returns the shortest sufficient answer to a factual question, with a source link per claim. Use for "what/which/when/how much/is X still..." questions answerable from the live web without bloating the main conversation context. Not for software implementation guides (use…

sammcj/agentic-coding · 129 tokens