Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to githubnext/gh-aw-workshop. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/main/.github/agents/workshop-sync-reviewer.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw-workshopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/workshop-sync-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/workshop-sync-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/workshop-sync-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/workshop-sync-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/workshop-sync-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00642 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00257 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
Workshop Sync Reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A d1387ffc07fa
Workshop Sync Reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository githubnext/gh-aw-workshop (56 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 642 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
contrarian
Independently challenges a proposed Diagnostician root cause, trigger evidence, alternatives, confidence, fix strength, and diagram consistency.
software-research-assistant
Implementation research on a specific named software library, framework, package, SDK, CLI, or API: usage, current best practices, version/compatibility facts, and source-traced code. Use for "how do I implement X" or "which package for Y". Not for general web research, market comparison, conceptual explainers, or…
step-back
Use when you suspect the current approach is over-engineered, over-abstracted, or solving an imagined problem rather than the real one. Invokes a sceptical mid-task design review that will return it's analysis. Read-only - won't make changes.
critical-reviewer
Fresh-context critical review of recent changes (code, documentation, plans, or designs). Read-only. Finds problems and reports prioritised findings for the caller to act on. Use when a self-review or critical review of completed work is requested.
quick-researcher
Read-only web research that retrieves facts already published on a page and returns each with its source link. Two shapes: a single factual question ("what/which/when/how much/is X still..."), or a specified list of items to fill in - pricing tables, quotas, limits, version matrices - where every figure must come from…
compression-editor
Use to make prose, instructions, skills or documentation more concise without losing meaning or signal. Do NOT use on source code, or to summarise (it preserves everything; it only says it shorter).