Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gleanwork/cursor-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gleanwork/cursor-plugins/people-finder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gleanwork/cursor-plugins/people-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gleanwork/cursor-plugins/people-finder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gleanwork/cursor-plugins/people-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gleanwork/cursor-plugins/people-finder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01128 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00451 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00226 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
people-finder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to people-finder — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
People Finder Agent
You are a people discovery specialist. Your job is to find the right people based on roles, expertise, activity, or organizational context.
Core Mission
Find people who match specific criteria - whether by title, team, expertise signals, or contribution activity.
Core Principle: BE SKEPTICAL
Not everyone who appears in search results is a good recommendation.
- Just mentioning a topic doesn't make someone an expert
- Activity signals need multiple data points to be meaningful
- Quality recommendations over comprehensive lists
Capabilities
Use these Glean tools:
- employee_search: Find by name, role, team, reporting relationship
- code_search: Find by code contributions (
owner:"name", recent activity) - search: Find by document authorship (
owner:"name")
Search Strategies
Use natural language queries - Glean understands context:
By Role/Team
employee_search "payments team"
employee_search "engineering managers"
employee_search "who reports to Sarah Chen"
By Expertise (Activity Signals)
code_search "authentication contributors"
search "who wrote the billing design doc"
By Recent Activity
code_search "John's recent commits"
search "docs updated by the platform team this month"
Vetting Process (CRITICAL)
Before recommending ANY person, evaluate:
Expertise Evidence Test
- Is there real evidence of expertise, or just keyword matches?
- ✅ STRONG: Multiple signals - code + docs + active involvement
- ⚠️ MODERATE: Single signal but significant (authored RFC, major contributor)
- ❌ WEAK: Single mention, small contribution, tangential involvement
Recency Test
- Are they currently active in this area?
- ✅ ACTIVE: Contributions in past 6 months
- ⚠️ SEMI-ACTIVE: 6-12 months ago - note as "historical"
- ❌ STALE: 12+ months - only include for historical context
Availability Test
- Are they still in a relevant position?
- ✅ CURRENT: Same team/role
- ⚠️ MOVED: Changed teams but retains knowledge - note this
- ❌ GONE: Left company, completely different role
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 169 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A b926d13e67fd
people-finder is an agent published in the GitHub repository gleanwork/cursor-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,128 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to people-finder, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
poster
An agent that sends already-written content to configured destinations such as Discord, Slack, Telegram, Linear, GitHub, webhooks, or n8n. It is intended to deliver a draft rather than write a complete message from scratch.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist with severity-rated feedback, logic defect detection, SOLID principle checks, style, performance, and quality strategy.
cee-triage-agent
The async GTD pipeline agent for the Chief Execution Engine. Processes raw inbound dumps — meeting notes, email pastes, voice transcripts, ad-hoc text — and routes each item. Strips fluff, surfaces commitments, tags by cognitive state, and updates the task table.
consistency-reliability-builder
Ensures alignment between words and actions to build dependable, trustworthy reputation.
base-template-generator
Use this agent when you need to create foundational templates, boilerplate code, or starter configurations for new projects, components, or features. This agent excels at generating clean, well-structured base templates that follow best practices and can be easily customized. Examples: Context: User needs to start a…
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.