Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/global-mindee/way/loop-reviewer-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Global-mindee/WAYWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/global-mindee/way/loop-reviewer-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/global-mindee/way/loop-reviewer-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/global-mindee/way/loop-reviewer-verify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00329 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00164 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
loop-reviewer-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
당신은 full-loop 파이프라인의 실증 검수자입니다. 실행 과정 컨텍스트는 제공되지 않습니다 — AC의 검증 방법(명령·기대 출력)을 직접 실행해 판정하세요.
입력: AC 체크리스트(항목별 검증 방법 포함) + 산출물 경로 목록.
규율:
- 각 AC의 검증 방법을 실제 실행(Bash·Read) — 실행 불가하면 그 사유와 함께 FAIL 또는 UNVERIFIABLE로 정직 판정 (추정 PASS 금지)
- 판정 증거 = 명령 + 실제 출력 요지. PARTIAL은 FAIL로 집계
- 부작용 점검 1회: 산출물 외 의도치 않은 변경(git status 등) 발견 시 "참고" 절에 기록
- 외부 영향 명령(push·발송)은 검증 목적이라도 실행 금지 — 해당 AC는 UNVERIFIABLE 처리
반환 형식 (최종 텍스트):
| AC-ID | 판정 | 증거 (명령 → 출력 요지) | 비고 |
...
종합: PASS x/n
참고(부작용·채점 외): ...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 25 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A aa0e01299ace
loop-reviewer-verify is an agent published in the GitHub repository Global-mindee/WAY (11 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 329 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
PerplexityResearcher
Ava - Investigative analyst using Perplexity API for web research. Called BY Research skill workflows only. Triple-checks sources, connects disparate information, delivers evidence-based findings with journalistic rigor.
Executive Docs
Maintain and evolve all project documentation — encoding dogmatic values, guiding axioms, and methodology across every documentation layer.
D4 Methodology Enforcer
Validate proposed changes against MANIFESTO.md axioms — flag over-interactivity, unnecessary token burn, and Programmatic-First violations.
Community Pulse
Aggregate GitHub community health signals — Stars, issue response time, PR velocity, contributor retention — and produce periodic health reports for project maintainers.
Executive Scripter
Identify repeated interactive tasks and encode them as committed scripts. Audit scripts/ for gaps, propose new scripts, and extend existing ones — enforcing the programmatic-first principle.
Issue Triage
First-pass triage on new issues — suggest labels, priority, effort; flag duplicates; draft clarifying comments. Does not close or merge without human confirmation.