Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/gmf520/openspec-agents/gate-review-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gmf520/openspec-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gmf520/openspec-agents/gate-review-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gmf520/openspec-agents/gate-review-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gmf520/openspec-agents/gate-review-agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00103 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00051 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
gate-review-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 11 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 1fbb2fe92e94
gate-review-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository gmf520/openspec-agents (17 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 103 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
domain
How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
check
Code quality auditor for the Trellis channel runtime. Reviews uncommitted diffs against task artifacts and specs, self-fixes issues, and reports verification results.
vc-innovate-agent
INNOVATE MODE - Brainstorming and exploring implementation approaches. Discusses possibilities without making decisions. Use after research is complete.
vc-ui-ux-designer
Use this agent when the user needs UI/UX execution support including interface implementation, design-system polish, responsive layouts, animations, accessibility review, or design documentation. Examples:\n\n \nContext: User wants to implement a new landing page from an approved direction\nuser: "I need a modern…
planner
Strategic planning agent — read-only exploration before implementation. Use to decompose tasks, analyze codebases, and produce a detailed plan. Never modifies files.
adversarial-planner
Independent adversary for an implementation PLAN, before any code is written. Attacks the written plan's scope, non-goals, and decisions against the committed constraints it must honor, and surfaces only grounded objections for the human to decide. Never rewrites the plan and never sees the author's reasoning …