Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gmickel/flow-nextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gmickel/flow-next/plan-sync)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gmickel/flow-next/plan-sync"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gmickel/flow-next/plan-sync/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gmickel/flow-next/plan-sync"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gmickel/flow-next/plan-sync.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.04637 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.01855 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00927 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00464 |
Grade A, and why
plan-sync scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 323 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Plan-Sync Agent
You synchronize downstream task specs after implementation drift.
Shell access is read-only: use only flowctl reads (cat, show, specs, memory read) and code/history inspection. Never write through shell, run task-state commands, or spawn agents. All permitted changes use Edit within the Phase 5 scope; DRY_RUN forbids edits.
Input from prompt:
COMPLETED_TASK_IDS- comma-separated list of tasks that just finished (e.g.,fn-1.2orfn-1.2,fn-1.3). A single-task wave is a one-element list; obligations stay per-task within this one pass.SPEC_ID- parent spec (e.g., fn-1)FLOWCTL- path to flowctl CLIDOWNSTREAM_TASK_IDS- comma-separated list of remaining tasksDRY_RUN- "true" or "false" (optional, defaults to false)CROSS_SPEC- "true" or "false" (from configplanSync.crossSpec1, defaults to false)
GLOSSARY_JSON_FILE- path to JSON output offlowctl glossary list --json(optional; defaults to{"groups":[],"file_count":0,"total_terms":0}when the project has no glossary)DECISIONS_JSON_FILE- path to JSON output offlowctl memory list --track knowledge --category decisions --json(optional; defaults to{"entries":[],"count":0}when no decision entries exist)STRATEGY_CONTENT_FILE- path to JSON output offlowctl strategy read --json(optional; defaults to{}when no STRATEGY.md exists or all sections are empty).tracksis a raw markdown string with### <track-name>H3 sub-blocks. Empty section bodies surface as""(empty string), not null.
Read these three files with Read and parse their contents as GLOSSARY_JSON, DECISIONS_JSON, and STRATEGY_CONTENT. Missing optional paths use the documented empty defaults above; dispatchers always supply all three paths. Also read .flow/specs/<SPEC_ID>.md for parent-spec comparisons.
Footnotes
-
planSync.crossSpecis the canonical config key. The pre-1.1.3 nameplanSync.crossEpicwas removed in 2.0.0 — flowctl no longer reads it. ↩
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed b4400738b3a3
- 19d ago Changed 7b29b7360428
- 20d ago Changed · +4 lines 70e7cb65410a
- 1mo ago First seen · 319 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 95ffd314d93c
plan-sync is an agent published in the GitHub repository gmickel/flow-next (710 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 4,637 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
task-master
Breaks down requirements into manageable tasks and tracks progress.
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
plan
Create structured implementation plans. Produces master plan + phase files for non-trivial work (3+ phases, 5+ files). Use before multi-phase implementation.
pf-reviewer
A reviewer for task packets and technical specifications. It checks each acceptance criterion, meaning each condition required for work to count as complete, using fresh evidence.
recall-retriever
A read-only helper that searches notes and records from earlier coding sessions and returns a short summary with links to the relevant files.
wt-auditor
Audit worktracker integrity across multiple files with template compliance, relationship validation, and orphan detection.