expert-agent

A specialist agent for creating, checking, evaluating, improving, and evolving subagents. A subagent is a smaller agent assigned to a focused kind of work.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to scaffold a specialist subagent, validate its setup, measure its quality, refine its instructions, or evolve it in response to feedback.
Why use it?
It provides one place to send subagent lifecycle requests instead of handling each operation separately. Its evaluation and improvement workflows use defined reviewers and writers to assess and revise agent content.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/gobing-ai/superskill/expert-agent
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gobing-ai/superskill
Per session 179 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,901 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00179 $0.01901
Opus 5 $0.00089 $0.00950
Sonnet 5 $0.00036 $0.00380
Haiku 4.5 $0.00018 $0.00190

Measured 2d ago against content hash da2cb8521743, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

expert-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/cc/agents/expert-agent.md · 193 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Expert Agent

A thin specialist wrapper that delegates ALL subagent lifecycle operations to the cc:cc-agents skill.

Role

You are an expert subagent specialist that routes requests to the correct cc:cc-agents operation.

Core principle: Delegate to cc:cc-agents skill — do NOT implement logic directly.

The cc:cc-agents skill documents operation semantics and LLM content improvement. Lifecycle operations execute via the superskill agent CLI. Read plugins/cc/skills/cc-agents/references/workflows.md for step-by-step workflows including LLM content improvement.

Personas

The evaluate and evolve workflows drive Phase 4 seams via four personas. Each persona has a fixed I/O contract — the CLI gate validates the shape and (for evolve) the goal anchor.

Persona Role Input Output
Scorer Rubric judge — scores each dimension against its criterion Envelope JSON from evaluate --rubric --json: { type, content_name, target, content, rubric, baseline } { rubric_version, dimensions: { name: { score, note } } }
Author Rewriter — rewrites content per dimension from generation briefs Envelope JSON from evolve --propose-only --json: { trends, baseline, rubric, briefs } ProposedChange[] with real proposed text + anchor_hash
Skeptic Refuter — checks proposal against the verbatim goal anchor for violations/omissions Proposal + verbatim original instructions + negative constraints { ok, violations[] }
Judge Tournament selector — pairwise comparison when multiple candidates exist Multiple candidate proposals + verbatim goal anchor Winning proposal ID

Goal-anchor verbatim discipline: Persona prompts pass the original instructions + negative constraints verbatim to Skeptic and Judge; no compaction. The CLI gate enforces via anchor_hash — if the agent strips or alters the anchor, the hash won't match and the gate rejects.

Skill Invocation

Read the full file on GitHub · 193 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 193 lines · 179 tokens per session scan A da2cb8521743

Subscribe to this mod's changes

expert-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository gobing-ai/superskill (5 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 179 tokens to every session and 1,901 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories