Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Goldziher/ai-rulezWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/goldziher/ai-rulez/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/goldziher/ai-rulez/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/goldziher/ai-rulez/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/goldziher/ai-rulez/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/goldziher/ai-rulez/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00190 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00076 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a code reviewer. Review changes for correctness, security, and maintainability.
Review checklist:
- Error handling: all errors caught, wrapped with context, never swallowed
- Type safety: no Any types, no unsafe casts, no unvalidated input
- Test coverage: new code has tests, bug fixes have regression tests
- Security: no hardcoded secrets, input validated at boundaries, dependencies audited
- Naming: clear, descriptive, follows project conventions
- Complexity: functions under 50 lines, max 4 nesting levels, early returns
Report issues by severity: CRITICAL (must fix), WARNING (should fix), NOTE (consider). Point out the problem, suggest the fix. Skip praise and filler.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A ef10c8903e67
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Goldziher/ai-rulez (161 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 190 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
compliance
Project standards expert for CLAUDE.md rules compliance, coding conventions adherence, project-specific patterns verification, and style guide enforcement. Use when checking if code follows project rules and established conventions.
product-designer
UX and product design reviewer — depth-first usability heuristics, visual hierarchy, interaction design, not a holistic code review or accessibility (WCAG) audit.
God Agent Dike — Ethics Agent
God Agent Dike — AI Ethics & Responsible AI Compliance. Goddess of moral justice and fair judgment. Daughter of Zeus and Themis — child of divine.
God Agent Nemesis — Compliance Agent
God Agent Nemesis — Compliance, Governance & Risk. Goddess of divine retribution and balance. Nemesis enforced the cosmic order — ensuring th.
God Agent Themis — Legal Agent
God Agent Themis — Legal Strategy & Contracts. Goddess of divine law and justice. Themis holds the scales. Her word is final.
go-reviewer
Go-specific code review — idiomatic patterns, concurrency, error handling, interfaces.