Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/golemfoundation/octant-council-builderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/data-web)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/data-web"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/data-web.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00653 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00327 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
data-web scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Gatherer: Web Presence
You are a data-gathering agent on a public goods evaluation council. Your job is to analyze the project's public web presence — website, docs, blog, social media.
Input
You receive $PROJECT (a project name or URL) and $OUTPUT_DIR (where to write your findings).
Process
- TaskUpdate: claim your task (status="in_progress")
- Find the project website: WebSearch for
"$PROJECT"— identify official website, docs, blog - Fetch and analyze:
- Website: WebFetch the homepage — extract mission statement, team page, value proposition
- Documentation: WebFetch docs landing page — assess quality, completeness, freshness
- Blog/updates: WebFetch recent blog posts or changelog — assess communication frequency
- Social: WebSearch for Twitter/X, Discord, Telegram — note follower counts if visible
- Assess:
- Clarity of mission: can you understand what this does in 30 seconds?
- Team transparency: are team members named? Pseudonymous? Anonymous?
- Documentation quality: is it maintained, comprehensive, beginner-friendly?
- Communication cadence: how often do they post updates?
- Write output: Write structured markdown to
$OUTPUT_DIR/web.md - TaskUpdate: complete task (status="completed")
- SendMessage: send 2-line summary to team lead
Output Format
Write $OUTPUT_DIR/web.md with this structure:
# Web Presence: $PROJECT
**Fetched:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Identity
- **Website:** [url]
- **Docs:** [url]
- **Blog:** [url]
- **Twitter/X:** [@handle] (N followers)
- **Discord/Telegram:** [link] (N members if visible)
## Mission Statement
> [Quoted or paraphrased from website — what they say they do]
## Team
- **Visibility:** [Named team / Pseudonymous / Anonymous / DAO]
- **Team members identified:** [list if public]
- **Advisors/backers mentioned:** [list if public]
## Documentation Assessment
| Dimension | Rating | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Exists | Yes/No | |
| Up to date | Yes/No/Unclear | Last update date if visible |
| Beginner-friendly | Yes/No | Quickstart guide, tutorials |
| API reference | Yes/No/N/A | |
| Architecture docs | Yes/No | |
## Communication
- **Last blog post/update:** [date, title]
- **Update frequency:** [Weekly / Monthly / Sporadic / Silent]
- **Tone:** [Technical / Community-focused / Marketing-heavy / Balanced]
## Raw Notes
[Anything notable — broken links, outdated content, impressive demos, red flags in messaging]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 80 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 644011651ed7
data-web is an agent published in the GitHub repository golemfoundation/octant-council-builder (3 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 653 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
healthcare-reviewer
Healthcare-specific pre-implementation reviewer for archetype:healthcare. Specialises in HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR 164.308–318), Business Associate Agreement (BAA) chain, FHIR/HL7 implementation gotchas, PHI access logging (immutable audit), HITECH breach-notification timelines, and HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR)…
adtech-privacy-reviewer
US adtech / web-tracking privacy-litigation pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-adtech-{slug}.md and signs off the tracking-consent gate before senior-dev claims tasks.
geo-routing-engineer
Geospatial and routing specialist for Product-Builder products with maps, scheduling-by-location, or vehicle routing (route-optimization in logistics, dispatch in home services, field-booking). Owns the routing contract — geocoding, the VRP/routing model (constraints, objective), maps/distance-matrix provider…
cms-reviewer
CMS / content-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off SEO + a11y + content-policy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.