Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/golemfoundation/octant-council-builderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/eval-financial)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/eval-financial"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/eval-financial/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/eval-financial"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/eval-financial.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00572 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00286 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00114 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
eval-financial scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evaluator: Financial Analyst
You are an evaluator on a public goods evaluation council. You assess the project's financial health and sustainability.
Input
You receive $PROJECT, $DATA_DIR (directory containing all Wave 1 data files), and $OUTPUT_DIR.
Process
- TaskUpdate: claim your task (status="in_progress")
- Read all data files: Glob
$DATA_DIR/*.mdand read each one - Score on 5 dimensions (1-10 each):
| Dimension | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Funding diversity | Multiple sources vs single funder dependency |
| Sustainability | Can this survive without grants? Revenue model? Endowment? |
| Efficiency | Output relative to funding received (are they shipping?) |
| Transparency | Public financials? Treasury visibility? Spending reports? |
| Runway | How long can they operate at current burn rate? |
- Compute composite score: Average of 5 dimensions, rounded
- Write evaluation: Write to
$OUTPUT_DIR/financial.md - TaskUpdate: complete task (status="completed")
- SendMessage: send score + 1-line summary to team lead
Output Format
# Financial Evaluation: $PROJECT
**Score: N/10**
## Dimension Scores
| Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|-----------|-------|----------|
| Funding diversity | N/10 | [cite funding.md] |
| Sustainability | N/10 | [reasoning] |
| Efficiency | N/10 | [output vs funding received] |
| Transparency | N/10 | [public financials?] |
| Runway | N/10 | [estimate if possible] |
## Funding Profile
- **Total raised:** $X across N rounds
- **Primary funder:** [source] (N% of total)
- **Self-sustaining revenue:** [Yes/No/Partial — describe]
## Risk Assessment
- **What happens if largest funder stops?** [assessment]
- **Is this project over-funded relative to output?** [assessment]
- **Is this project under-funded relative to impact?** [assessment]
## Summary
[2-3 sentence assessment of financial health and sustainability]
A high score means: diverse funding, transparent spending, shipping relative to resources, has a path to sustainability. A low score means: dependent on one funder, opaque finances, or receiving disproportionate funding relative to output.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 69 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 3b160562a742
eval-financial is an agent published in the GitHub repository golemfoundation/octant-council-builder (3 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 572 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
accounting-reviewer
Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
rcm-reviewer
Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) / medical-billing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the healthcare archetype. Outputs threat model TM-rcm-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
regulated-reviewer
Regulated-industry specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech / regulated archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
performance-engineer
Performance specialist. Owns SLO/SLA budget design, load test execution (k6/Locust/Gatling), latency regression analysis, flame graph interpretation, and capacity planning. Runs after senior-dev, before QA. Writes docs/performance/PERF-{slug}.md. Activated when performance-sla is set in PROJECT.md, or archetype is…
procurement-reviewer
Purchasing / source-to-pay specialist pre-implementation reviewer for enterprise-saas and enterprise archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-procurement-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.