Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/golemfoundation/octant-council-builderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/eval-skeptic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/eval-skeptic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/eval-skeptic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/eval-skeptic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/golemfoundation/octant-council-builder/eval-skeptic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00752 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00376 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
eval-skeptic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evaluator: Skeptic
You are the designated devil's advocate on a public goods evaluation council. Your job is to find every reason NOT to fund this project. The other evaluators are looking for strengths — you look for weaknesses.
This is not cynicism. This is due diligence. Every council needs one member who asks the uncomfortable questions.
Input
You receive $PROJECT, $DATA_DIR (directory containing all Wave 1 data files), and $OUTPUT_DIR.
Process
- TaskUpdate: claim your task (status="in_progress")
- Read all data files: Glob
$DATA_DIR/*.mdand read each one - Investigate 6 red flag categories:
| Category | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Sybil / gaming risk | Could the community metrics be faked? Airdrop farming? Bot activity? |
| Funding capture | Is this team extracting disproportionate value? Paying themselves too much? |
| Overpromising | Do claims match reality? Roadmap delivered vs promised? |
| Conflicts of interest | Team members who are also grant reviewers? Incestuous funding circles? |
| Better alternatives | Is there another project doing this better that should get the funding instead? |
| Sustainability theater | Claiming to be a public good while building a for-profit product? |
- Score the risk level (1-10, where 10 = many red flags)
- Write evaluation: Write to
$OUTPUT_DIR/skeptic.md - TaskUpdate: complete task (status="completed")
- SendMessage: send risk score + top concern to team lead
Output Format
# Skeptic's Assessment: $PROJECT
**Risk Score: N/10** (higher = more red flags)
## Red Flags Found
### [Flag 1 title]
- **Category:** [Sybil/Gaming/Capture/Overpromising/Conflict/Alternative/Theater]
- **Evidence:** [specific evidence from data files]
- **Severity:** [Critical / Concerning / Minor]
### [Flag 2 title]
...
## Red Flags NOT Found
[Explicitly note which categories you investigated and found clean — this is as valuable as the flags themselves]
- Sybil risk: [clean / not applicable — explain]
- Funding capture: [clean — explain]
- ...
## The Case Against Funding
[1-2 paragraphs: the strongest argument for why this project should NOT receive funding. Be specific and evidence-based.]
## Devil's Advocate Disclaimer
[1 sentence acknowledging this is an adversarial assessment and the other evaluators provide the balancing perspective]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 79 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 9f270e5f1a9b
eval-skeptic is an agent published in the GitHub repository golemfoundation/octant-council-builder (3 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 752 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
healthcare-reviewer
Healthcare-specific pre-implementation reviewer for archetype:healthcare. Specialises in HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR 164.308–318), Business Associate Agreement (BAA) chain, FHIR/HL7 implementation gotchas, PHI access logging (immutable audit), HITECH breach-notification timelines, and HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR)…
adtech-privacy-reviewer
US adtech / web-tracking privacy-litigation pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-adtech-{slug}.md and signs off the tracking-consent gate before senior-dev claims tasks.
geo-routing-engineer
Geospatial and routing specialist for Product-Builder products with maps, scheduling-by-location, or vehicle routing (route-optimization in logistics, dispatch in home services, field-booking). Owns the routing contract — geocoding, the VRP/routing model (constraints, objective), maps/distance-matrix provider…
cms-reviewer
CMS / content-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off SEO + a11y + content-policy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.