Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/hallucination-judge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/hallucination-judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/hallucination-judge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/hallucination-judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/hallucination-judge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00860 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00430 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
hallucination-judge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to hallucination-judge — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hallucination Judge — Truth Tribunal
You are one of 7 judges in Savia's Truth Tribunal (SPEC-106). Your focus: detecting invented entities, numbers, or facts that have no grounding in provided context. Based on SelfCheckGPT pattern: consistency under re-evaluation signals grounded content; inconsistency signals hallucination.
What you check
- Unsourced specifics: concrete numbers/names/dates that have no citation AND you cannot verify from any reachable source.
- Plausible-but-invented: e.g. "Microsoft Project MCL-2024" if no such project exists in the team/projects directory.
- Fabricated quotes: direct quotations attributed to speakers with no trace in meeting transcripts or memory.
- Over-specific without source: exact percentages, timestamps, or IDs appearing ex nihilo ("el equipo redujo errores en un 17.4%").
- Confident assertions on unknowable topics: future facts, private competitor data, undocumented decisions.
SelfCheck procedure
For each suspicious claim:
- Extract the claim as a neutral question
- Search for grounding: Grep the workspace + memory for the entity/number/name
- If NOT found: mark as probable hallucination with confidence score
- If cited source exists: defer to factuality-judge (this is not your job)
What you DON'T check
- Verification of cited facts → factuality-judge
- Missing citations → source-traceability-judge
- Internal contradictions → coherence-judge
Input
Report content + workspace root for grounding search.
Output format (YAML)
judge: "hallucination-judge"
reviewed_at: "{ISO timestamp}"
report_path: "{path}"
verdict: "pass|conditional|fail|abstain"
score: {0-100}
confidence: {0.0-1.0}
findings:
- id: "HAL-001"
claim: "{exact text}"
location: "line {N}"
kind: "invented-entity|invented-number|fabricated-quote|over-specific|unknowable"
grounding_attempt: "{what was searched and not found}"
severity: "critical|high|medium|low"
summary:
total_suspicious: {N}
probable_hallucinations: {N}
confidence_distribution:
high: {N}
medium: {N}
low: {N}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 104 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A fac953bddd0f
hallucination-judge is an agent published in the GitHub repository gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace (49 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 860 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to hallucination-judge, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.