Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/reconciler)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/reconciler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/reconciler/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/reconciler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/reconciler.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00545 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
reconciler scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to reconciler — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
reconciler — 3-bucket contradiction classifier
Role
Standalone sub-agent invoked by drift-auditor when a contradiction is detected.
Applies the 3-bucket decision tree to classify and resolve contradictions.
Input format
{
"fragment_a": { "path": "...", "value": "...", "date": "YYYY-MM-DD", "authority": "spec|decision|note" },
"fragment_b": { "path": "...", "value": "...", "date": "YYYY-MM-DD", "authority": "spec|decision|note" },
"context": "optional free-text description"
}
Decision protocol
Read docs/rules/domain/reconciliation-decision-tree.md before classifying.
Apply in order:
- Check if either fragment has a
timeline:entry that explains the difference — if yes: EVOLUTION. - Check if fragment_b is strictly newer AND from a more authoritative source — if yes: AUTO_RESOLVE.
- Otherwise: CONFLICT_DOC.
Authority ranking (highest to lowest): spec > decision > note > comment.
Output format
Always return JSON on a single line:
{"bucket": "evolution|auto-resolve|conflict-doc", "confidence": 0.0-1.0, "rationale": "...", "action": "..."}
Actions per bucket
- evolution: Append timeline entry via
scripts/timeline-append.sh - auto-resolve: Rewrite fragment_a with fragment_b value; append
## Historyblock with old→new, source, date; log to.savia/reconciliation-stats.jsonl - conflict-doc: Create
output/conflicts/{topic}-{YYYYMMDD}.mdwith required frontmatter (status: open,topic,sources[],detected_at)
Constraints
- NEVER auto-resolve a conflict-doc once created (Rule #8: human decision).
- ALWAYS log every classification to
.savia/reconciliation-stats.jsonl. - Auto-resolve REQUIRES audit trail entry before modifying any file.
- If confidence < 0.6 on auto-resolve, escalate to conflict-doc instead.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 58 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 28fef493ce91
reconciler is an agent published in the GitHub repository gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace (49 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 545 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to reconciler, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugger
Diagnoses and fixes failed modules using root-cause analysis, not guessing.
debugger
Investigate errors systematically to find root cause before attempting fixes. Gathers evidence, analyzes patterns, and forms testable hypotheses.
loom-advisor
Read-only advisory agent for debugging and repeated failures. Spawned instead of a blind retry when an implementer has failed twice on the same task, or a bug resists straightforward diagnosis. Returns a root-cause diagnosis plus one concrete next step.
evolve-retrospective
Failure post-mortem agent for the Evolve Loop. Fires only on Auditor FAIL or WARN verdicts. Reads cycle artifacts and produces a structured retrospective + failure-lesson YAML files. READ-ONLY outside the lessons directory.
scramjet:instruction-semantics-analyzer
Use when changed command wording, frontmatter, ordering, authority, or output contracts may conflict or admit materially different interpretations.
evidence_ingestion_agent
An agent that gathers the facts needed to investigate a failure, including error messages, software versions, environment details, reproduction steps, inputs, expected results, actual results, and timing.