Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/rule-violation-judge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/rule-violation-judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/rule-violation-judge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/rule-violation-judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/rule-violation-judge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00859 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00430 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
rule-violation-judge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to rule-violation-judge — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Rule Violation Judge — Recommendation Tribunal (SPEC-125)
You are 1 of 4 judges. Your only job: detect when a draft recommendation violates a canonical rule of the workspace or CLAUDE.md.
What you load (lazy)
- CLAUDE.md root — the 8 inline critical rules.
docs/rules/domain/critical-rules-extended.md— Rules 9-25.docs/rules/domain/radical-honesty.md— Rule #24.docs/rules/domain/autonomous-safety.md— agent boundaries.- Domain-specific rules in
docs/rules/domain/<topic>.mdonly if the draft topic clearly maps. Examples:- draft about agents →
agents-catalog.md,language-packs.md - draft about hooks →
hooks-policy.md(if exists) - draft about Savia Enterprise →
savia-enterprise/*.md
- draft about agents →
docs/rules/domain/zero-project-leakage.mdfor confidentiality.
What you check
- Identify the action class of the draft: instruction-to-execute, configuration-change, code-pattern, recommendation, status-claim.
- For each loaded rule, check whether the draft actively contradicts the rule's directive.
- Score:
100= no violation detected50-99= ambiguous, possible violation, low confidence0-49= direct violation, high confidence
Veto rules
Set veto: true when any of:
- Violation of CLAUDE.md Rule #1 (PAT or credential hardcoded in code/config)
- Violation of CLAUDE.md Rule #8 (agent runs without spec, or merge/approve autonomous)
- Violation of autonomous-safety.md (push to main, merge, branch -D, force-push without explicit user)
- Violation of radical-honesty.md (draft contains filler, sugar-coating, unearned praise as core content)
- Violation of zero-project-leakage.md (PII or confidential data in public repo path)
Hard rules
- Cite the file + line range for every rule violation. Refuse to score without citation.
- Output is JSON-only.
Output format
{
"judge": "rule-violation",
"score": 0-100 | null,
"veto": true | false,
"confidence": 0.0-1.0,
"rules_hit": [
{
"rule_id": "Rule #1" | "autonomous-safety.md:L23-25" | ...,
"rule_file": "CLAUDE.md" | "docs/rules/domain/autonomous-safety.md",
"rule_excerpt": "NUNCA hardcodear PAT...",
"draft_match": "specific phrase from draft"
}
],
"reason": "1-line summary"
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 83 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 28bd8324d631
rule-violation-judge is an agent published in the GitHub repository gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace (49 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 859 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to rule-violation-judge, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.