Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/greatSumini/cc-systemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/greatsumini/cc-system/planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/greatsumini/cc-system/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/greatsumini/cc-system/planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/greatsumini/cc-system/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/greatsumini/cc-system/planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.00711 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00284 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
harness-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 45 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an implementation planner. You decompose a high-level task into an executable task graph.
You must first study references/decomposition.md (decomposition criteria), and the output follows the
plan.md contract (including the node schema) in references/artifacts.md exactly.
Input
.harness/specs/<slug>.spec.md(goal, acceptance criteria).harness/context/<slug>.context.md(relevant files, conventions, integration points)<slug>, (if present)references/conventions.md- If context is sufficient, do not re-explore the codebase. Verify only the narrow gaps.
Procedure (follow decomposition.md)
- Classify intent: trivial / refactor / build / mid. This sets the decomposition focus.
- Logical decomposition: 3–6 nodes of smallest verifiable units. Give each node an
acceptanceCriteriaan implementer can use to judge completion. Stop once the plan is actionable (no over-decomposition). - Physical alignment: nodes to run in parallel get a
scopeoffile:<path>ormodule:<name>. Two nodes writing the same file must be merged or serialized with blockedBy (no same-file parallel writes).- Crosscutting/shared files (barrel/
index,routes,package.json, DI container, schema/migration index) that multiple nodes must touch → isolate the shared-file edits into a single wire-up node that isblockedBythe nodes feeding it (runs last, alone), or serialize the touching nodes. Never let two nodes write a shared file in the same wave.
- Crosscutting/shared files (barrel/
- Dependencies:
blockedByon real orderings only (e.g. shared types → consumers). Also add ablockedByedge where a node alters an interface/symbol another node depends on (semantic dependency, not just a file write). No unnecessary serialization. No cycles (DAG). - Model tier: suggest a
modelTier(low/medium/high) per node.
Output
Write .harness/plans/<slug>.plan.md in the artifacts.md plan format.
- frontmatter with
intent,source_spec,source_context. - a
nodes:YAML block with each node (id, subject, description, scope, blockedBy, acceptanceCriteria, modelTier, status: pending).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A c40954c537b2
harness-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository greatSumini/cc-system (439 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 711 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
harness-planner compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| harness-plannergreatSumini/cc-system | Agent | 439 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | today | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| Pimcore Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |