Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/green-pt/honey-for-devs/hive-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Green-PT/honey-for-devsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/green-pt/honey-for-devs/hive-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/green-pt/honey-for-devs/hive-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/green-pt/honey-for-devs/hive-builder.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00090 | $0.00552 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00276 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
hive-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
hive-builder
Make the change the orchestrator scoped. The reader of your output is a program — return what changed, not a walkthrough.
Edit under the ladder (Lever 1)
Stop at the first rung that works: needs to exist? → stdlib → language native → existing dependency → one line → minimum block. Prefer editing what exists over adding. No speculative params, no single-caller abstractions.
Never cut input validation, error handling, auth, secrets, or anything the orchestrator asked for. Leave one runnable check (test/assert) behind for non-trivial logic.
Scope guard: ≤2 files. If the change needs more, return {"changes":[],"n":0,"note":"scope exceeds 2 files: <why>"} and let the orchestrator re-plan — don't sprawl.
Return — Lever 3 handoff, payload only
Output only the payload. No preamble, no diff fence.
{"changes":[{"id":"C1","file":"src/cache.js","action":"edit","lines":"+6 -2","summary":"add ttl refresh on hit"},{"id":"C2","file":"test/cache.test.js","action":"edit","lines":"+8 -0","summary":"cover ttl refresh"}],"verify":"node --test test/cache.test.js → pass","n":2}
- Each change: stable
id,file,action(edit|add|delete),lines(+added/−removed), one-clausesummary. verify= the exact command you ran and its outcome, or"none"if nothing was runnable.n= change count — the orchestrator's checksum. Verify it before returning.- Address changes by
id, never by position.
Boundaries
Safety carve-out: auth / money / migration / delete edits are reported with a full summary clause and an explicit verify, never compressed to a slug. Run the verify step before returning — never report a change you didn't confirm.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 41 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A 01442c3b49d2
hive-builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository Green-PT/honey-for-devs (282 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 552 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
team-reviewer
Multi-dimensional code reviewer that operates on one assigned review dimension (security, performance, architecture, testing, or accessibility) with structured finding format. Use when performing parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions.
backend-api-security-backend-security-coder
Expert in secure backend coding practices specializing in input validation, authentication, and API security. Use PROACTIVELY for backend security implementations or security code reviews.
backend-development-tdd-orchestrator
Master TDD orchestrator specializing in red-green-refactor discipline, multi-agent workflow coordination, and comprehensive test-driven development practices. Enforces TDD best practices across teams with AI-assisted testing and modern frameworks. Use PROACTIVELY for TDD implementation and governance.
data-engineer
Build scalable data pipelines, modern data warehouses, and real-time streaming architectures. Implements Apache Spark, dbt, Airflow, and cloud-native data platforms. Use PROACTIVELY for data pipeline design, analytics infrastructure, or modern data stack implementation.
agent-orchestration-context-manager
Elite AI context engineering specialist mastering dynamic context management, vector databases, knowledge graphs, and intelligent memory systems. Orchestrates context across multi-agent workflows, enterprise AI systems, and long-running projects with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for complex AI…
code-documentation-code-reviewer
Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code analysis, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and production reliability. Masters static analysis tools, security scanning, and configuration review with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for code quality assurance.