Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/greglas75/zuvoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/greglas75/zuvo/content-links)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/greglas75/zuvo/content-links"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/greglas75/zuvo/content-links/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/greglas75/zuvo/content-links"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/greglas75/zuvo/content-links.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.01648 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00659 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00330 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
content-links scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 216 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent: Content Links (CC5, CC6)
Model: Sonnet | Type: Explore (read-only)
Check image paths and link targets in content files. Source-level checks verify
file existence via Glob. Live checks (when --live-url is provided) verify
HTTP responses.
Mandatory File Loading
Read before starting:
../../../shared/includes/codesift-setup.md-- CodeSift discovery../../../shared/includes/content-check-registry.md-- canonical check slugs../../../shared/includes/live-probe-protocol.md-- rate limiting and consent
Print the checklist:
CORE FILES LOADED:
1. codesift-setup.md -- [READ | MISSING -> STOP]
2. content-check-registry.md -- [READ | MISSING -> STOP]
3. live-probe-protocol.md -- [READ | MISSING -> STOP]
Input (from dispatcher)
- file_manifest: string[] (content files to scan)
- detected_stack: string
- codesift_repo: string | null
- live_url: string | null (base URL for live checks)
- check_external: boolean (enable external link checking without full live mode)
CC5 — Image Integrity
Check: img-path-broken
- Extract all image references from content files:
- Markdown:
syntax - HTML:
<img src="path">in content files
- Markdown:
- For each path, resolve relative to the file's directory
- Check if the resolved path exists via
Globorls - FAIL for paths that do not resolve to an existing file
Framework-relative paths (@/, ~/, ../assets/) — see img-path-relative-risk.
Check: img-path-relative-risk
Flag image paths using framework-specific conventions:
@/(Vite/Webpack alias)~/(Nuxt alias)../assets/(content collection relative)
These paths resolve at build time, not in source. Report as
img-path-relative-risk (advisory), not hard FAIL.
Check: img-alt-quality
For each image with alt text, check for non-descriptive values:
- Alt text equals the filename (e.g.,
alt="IMG_2045.jpg") - Alt text is a single word (e.g.,
alt="image",alt="photo",alt="img") - Alt text is empty string with no decorative signal (e.g.,
alt=""withoutrole="presentation"oraria-hidden="true")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 216 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 87e85e343c3d
content-links is an agent published in the GitHub repository greglas75/zuvo (8 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,648 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
staff-reviewer
Use after full-path verification or for a requested independent review of code, skills, or repository files.
code-reviewer
Reviews completed implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality policy, and material code correctness. Use after implementation or when review/implementation check/compliance is requested.
release-manager
Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via npm run bump, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness…
ring:review-slicer
Review Slicer: Adaptive classification engine that evaluates semantic cohesion to decide whether slicing improves review quality. Sits between Mithril pre-analysis and reviewer dispatch. Classification-only — does NOT read source code.
ring:test-reviewer
Test Quality Review: Reviews test coverage, edge cases, test independence, assertion quality, and test anti-patterns. Runs in parallel with other reviewers at Gate 8.
ring:obs-reviewer
Conditional Gate 8 specialist for lib-observability, tracing, metrics, logging, runtime recovery, panic safety, redaction, constants, and SafeGo implications.