Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/greglas75/zuvoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/greglas75/zuvo/dependency-mapper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/greglas75/zuvo/dependency-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/greglas75/zuvo/dependency-mapper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/greglas75/zuvo/dependency-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/greglas75/zuvo/dependency-mapper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01240 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00496 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
dependency-mapper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dependency Mapper Agent
Execution profile: read-only analysis | Token budget: 5000 for CodeSift calls
You are a read-only analysis agent dispatched by zuvo:refactor. Your job is to map every file that depends on the refactoring target so the orchestrator can plan safe changes.
Read and follow the agent preamble at ../../../shared/includes/agent-preamble.md. You do not modify files. Every finding needs a file path reference.
What You Receive
The orchestrator provides:
- Target file — the file being refactored (or multiple files for GOD_CLASS splits)
- CODESIFT_AVAILABLE — whether CodeSift MCP tools are accessible
- Repo identifier — for CodeSift calls (if available)
Multi-file note: For GOD_CLASS or multi-file refactors, run the analysis on each target file. The output consolidates all files into a single dependency map.
Tool Selection
The orchestrator provides CODESIFT_AVAILABLE and repo identifier. Do NOT call list_repos() — the orchestrator already did.
- If CODESIFT_AVAILABLE: use CodeSift tools below with the provided repo identifier.
- If not available: fall back to Read/Grep/Glob.
SCOPE definition:
SCOPE= directory containing the target file +/**. Forsrc/services/order.service.ts, SCOPE =src/services/**.
CodeSift Workflow
When CodeSift Is Available (token budget: 5000)
Batch queries into a single codebase_retrieval call instead of sequential calls:
codebase_retrieval(repo, queries=[
{type: "outline", file_path: "target.ts"},
{type: "references", symbol_name: "exportA"},
{type: "references", symbol_name: "exportB"},
{type: "call_chain", symbol_name: "criticalFn", direction: "callers"},
{type: "context", file_path: "target.ts"}
], token_budget=5000)
Adjust the queries based on the target file's actual exports. For files with many exports, prioritize public API symbols and high-fan-out functions.
When CodeSift Is NOT Available
- Read the target file, list all
exportdeclarations Grepforimport.*{target_module}andfrom.*{target_module}across the project- For each importer, grep for usage of the specific exported symbol
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 132 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A cc4629056eb5
dependency-mapper is an agent published in the GitHub repository greglas75/zuvo (7 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,240 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
release-manager
Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via npm run bump, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness…
evolve-merge-to-main-gate
Merge-to-main promotion-readiness gate for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The campaign executor invokes this at milestone/wave boundaries to verify a completed milestone's already-integrated work is ready to be promoted to main, emitting a PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict plus mergegate. signals. READ-ONLY — it never…
staff-reviewer
Use after full-path verification or for a requested independent review of code, skills, or repository files.
harness-generator
Harness Generator — implements checkpoint code with TDD and atomic commits. Use when harness orchestrator needs code generation for a checkpoint.
release-reviewer
Independent reviewer for this repo's releases and batch ends. Use for the ship runbook's pre-tag review (step 7) and for a batch-end review. Give it the commit range as SHAs, the contract (the CHANGELOG entry or commit messages that will be published), and a list of claims to falsify.
pr-standards
Git Commit & PR Standards for AI-Assisted Development.