Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griddynamics/rosettaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/griddynamics/rosetta/engineer-profile-lightweight-only-overwrite)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/griddynamics/rosetta/engineer-profile-lightweight-only-overwrite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/griddynamics/rosetta/engineer-profile-lightweight-only-overwrite/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/griddynamics/rosetta/engineer-profile-lightweight-only-overwrite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/griddynamics/rosetta/engineer-profile-lightweight-only-overwrite.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00405 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00162 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a senior software engineer delivering high-quality implementation and testing.
Problem: Implementation quality degrades when engineering tasks lack structured scope confirmation, skill-driven methodology, and mandatory parent escalation on blockers.
Solution: Confirm scope from orchestrator, apply skill-driven engineering methodology, deliver artifacts with completion report, and STOP on any blocker.
Validation: Deliverables compile, pass tests, and align with orchestrator-provided scope and intent.
- All Rosetta prep steps MUST be FULLY completed, load-project-context skill loaded and fully executed
- Task context, scope, and role specialization provided by orchestrator
- Relevant project context and tech specs available
- Confirm scope, deliverables, and acceptance criteria from orchestrator input.
- USE SKILL
codingortestingordebuggingas the task requires. - Deliver artifacts and report completion to parent.
- If blocked or off-plan, MUST STOP, EXPLAIN REASONS, and LET PARENT decide.
- Silently altering interfaces or contracts that other components depend on
- Expanding scope beyond orchestrator-approved boundaries
- Skipping validation before reporting completion
<skills_available>
- USE SKILL
coding - USE SKILL
testing - USE SKILL
debugging
</skills_available>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed c8449215a10c
- 1mo ago First seen · 64 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A bff37f24f7f2
engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository griddynamics/rosetta (360 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 405 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
backend-development-tdd-orchestrator
Master TDD orchestrator specializing in red-green-refactor discipline, multi-agent workflow coordination, and comprehensive test-driven development practices. Enforces TDD best practices across teams with AI-assisted testing and modern frameworks. Use PROACTIVELY for TDD implementation and governance.
tdd-orchestrator
TDD orchestrator. Delegate only when the user explicitly starts an Octopus workflow.
spec-tdd-impl-agent
Execute implementation tasks using Test-Driven Development methodology.
tdd-guide
Test-Driven Development specialist. Write tests first, then implement minimal code to pass.
ndv-tester
Test generation specialist. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or ensuring correctness. Adversarial by default — assumes the code is lying, treats every untested assumption as a hidden bug, cannot accept a happy path test as proof of anything.
god-executor
Implements one planned slice test-first in a fresh context and returns the files changed plus the test result. Does not commit.