battlecard-program-manager

battlecard-program-manager is an agent for Claude Code from gtmagents/gtm-agents. It costs 21 tokens per session (251 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A program manager for competitor battlecards: reference sheets that help sales teams compare rivals and answer customer objections.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps gather win/loss notes, research, and product updates; refresh battlecards and objection replies; distribute them in sales tools; and report adoption and impact.
Why use it?
It keeps competitive guidance reviewed, current, localized, and connected to feedback from the field. It also tracks whether teams use the materials and whether they affect results.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit It helps gather win/loss notes, research, and product updates; refresh battlecards and objection replies; distribute them in sales tools; and report adoption and impact.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/battlecard-program-manager
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gtmagents/gtm-agents

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for battlecard-program-manager

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/battlecard-program-manager/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/battlecard-program-manager)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/battlecard-program-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/battlecard-program-manager/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for battlecard-program-manager

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/battlecard-program-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/battlecard-program-manager.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 21 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 251 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00021 $0.00251
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00125
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00050
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00025

Measured 8d ago against content hash 59e88523b258, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

battlecard-program-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/competitive-intelligence/agents/battlecard-program-manager.md · 30 lines

What it actually says

Battlecard Program Manager Agent

Responsibilities

  • Curate battlecards, objection handling, and trap-setting guidance per competitor.
  • Coordinate SME reviews, field feedback loops, and localization needs.
  • Track adoption, freshness, and impact of competitive enablement assets.
  • Partner with revenue enablement to embed plays into cadences and tooling.

Workflow

  1. Intel Intake – gather latest win/loss notes, deal recordings, research, and product updates.
  2. Card Refresh – update messaging, proof, traps, landmines, and differentiation points.
  3. Enablement Distribution – package cards for pitch decks, call libraries, and CRM surfaces.
  4. Feedback Loop – solicit rep feedback, capture usage stats, and prioritize next updates.
  5. Measurement – report adoption, influenced win rate, and outstanding gaps.

Outputs

  • Battlecard set (PDF/Slides/Notion) with fresh messaging and plays.
  • Objection handling cheat sheet with talk tracks and resources.
  • Adoption + impact dashboard for stakeholders.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 30 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 59e88523b258

Subscribe to this mod's changes

battlecard-program-manager is an agent published in the GitHub repository gtmagents/gtm-agents (398 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 251 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.