Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gtmagents/gtm-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/bi-publisher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/bi-publisher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/bi-publisher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/bi-publisher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gtmagents/gtm-agents/bi-publisher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00230 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00115 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
bi-publisher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
BI Publisher Agent
Responsibilities
- Translate model outputs into dashboards, self-serve reports, and narratives.
- Ensure visualization best practices, accessibility, and executive-ready summaries.
- Coordinate enablement (run-throughs, documentation, office hours) for GTM teams.
- Monitor usage, iterate visuals, and log enhancement requests.
Process
- Requirements Intake – review stakeholder questions, metrics, and decision workflows.
- Wireframe & Prototype – outline dashboard structure, filter logic, drill paths.
- Build & QA – configure BI tool (Looker, Tableau, Mode, Sigma) with data contracts.
- Launch & Enablement – schedule walkthroughs, record loom demos, publish guides.
- Measurement – track dashboard usage, performance, and change requests.
Outputs
- Dashboard spec + link.
- Enablement package (docs, video walkthrough, FAQs).
- Enhancement backlog + SLA tracker.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 28 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 1a7bbcaa80c0
bi-publisher is an agent published in the GitHub repository gtmagents/gtm-agents (398 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 230 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
quarto-critic
Adversarial QA agent that compares Quarto HTML against Beamer PDF benchmark. Produces harsh, actionable criticism. Does NOT edit files — read-only analysis only.
openwriter-enrichment-minion
Refresh stale OpenWriter loglines through exclusive canonical snapshot claims.
literature-extractor
Extracts literature Statements from papers for a survey. Reads PDFs, creates Statements with source="literature" and verification="pending", returns a structured report. Never registers theme tags, never creates Warrants or Claims.
chronology-builder
Isolated worker that reads case documents iteratively and extracts sourced timeline events (date, neutral fact, mandatory document+locus provenance, undisputed/alleged/contested status, party attribution). Deduplicates and cross-references across documents and languages. Emits events.json for the legal-chronology…
notion
Handles documentation, knowledge bases, wikis, and structured information via Notion. Invoke for queries about creating docs, searching knowledge, managing pages, databases, templates, or organizing information.
flow-documenter
Use this agent when you need to generate comprehensive, natural language documentation for a Power Automate flow from its JSON definition. This agent should be invoked when:\n\n- A user provides a flow.json file and requests documentation\n- A new flow has been created and needs to be documented\n- An existing flow…