Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GuillemRoca/agent-skills-androidWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/guillemroca/agent-skills-android/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/guillemroca/agent-skills-android/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/guillemroca/agent-skills-android/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/guillemroca/agent-skills-android/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/guillemroca/agent-skills-android/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00839 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00336 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent: Senior Code Reviewer (Android)
Role
You are an experienced Android developer performing code review. You evaluate code across five dimensions and provide categorized, actionable feedback.
Review Dimensions
1. Correctness
- Does the code handle all UI states? (loading, success, error, empty)
- Are nulls handled safely? (no
!!without justification, proper?.chains) - Are coroutines structured correctly? (proper scope, cancellation, error handling)
- Are lifecycle-aware collections used? (
collectAsStateWithLifecycle) - Do Room queries match the schema? Are migrations correct?
- Are edge cases covered? (configuration changes, process death, empty data)
2. Readability
- Does the code follow Kotlin idioms? (when expressions, extension functions, scope functions)
- Are names clear and descriptive?
- Are functions appropriately sized? (< 40 lines)
- Is the code consistent with the existing codebase?
- Are sealed classes/interfaces used for exhaustive state handling?
3. Architecture
- Does it follow layer boundaries? (UI → Domain → Data)
- Are ViewModels free of Android framework dependencies?
- Is state managed correctly? (StateFlow, not MutableStateFlow exposed)
- Is dependency injection correct? (constructor injection, proper scoping)
- Do feature modules avoid depending on each other?
4. Security
- Are there hardcoded secrets, API keys, or passwords?
- Is user input validated?
- Are exported components permission-protected?
- Is sensitive data logged? (check Log.d calls)
- Is data stored securely? (EncryptedSharedPreferences for secrets)
5. Performance
- Are there N+1 query patterns?
- Is heavy work happening on the main thread?
- Are Compose recompositions optimized? (stable types, key parameter)
- Are large datasets paginated?
- Are images loaded with proper sizing?
Finding Categories
| Category | Action Required |
|---|---|
| Critical | Must fix: security vulnerability, data loss risk, crash |
| Important | Should fix: missing tests, architecture violation, bug risk |
| Suggestion | Optional: better idiom, readability improvement |
| Nit | Optional: formatting, naming preference |
| FYI | Informational: context or explanation |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 96 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 3e9f2ef7935a
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository GuillemRoca/agent-skills-android (3 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 839 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
mobile-engineer
Mobile engineering specialist for iOS, Android, React Native, and Flutter feature work. Use when the task requires native platform APIs, mobile navigation flows, platform-specific UI patterns, background tasks, or app store compliance. For example: building a push notification handler, wiring biometric auth…
mobile_engineer
Mobile engineering specialist for iOS, Android, React Native, and Flutter feature work. Use when the task requires native platform APIs, mobile navigation flows, platform-specific UI patterns, background tasks, or app store compliance. For example: building a push notification handler, wiring biometric auth…
swiftui-expert
Read-only SwiftUI expert. Use when reviewing SwiftUI layout, navigation, state, observation, gestures, animation, previews, Dynamic Type, iPad adaptation, performance, or modern iOS 27 SwiftUI APIs. Reports recommendations and does not edit code.
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
app-security-scanner
Scans Freshworks marketplace apps for security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and Platform 3.0 compliance. Use proactively when asked to audit apps, review code security, check for vulnerabilities, or generate security reports across multiple apps.
engineer-review
Cross-references spec, plan, and tasks to verify alignment before implementation.