Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gutomec/nirvana-os-engineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gutomec/nirvana-os-engine/judge-x.pi)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gutomec/nirvana-os-engine/judge-x.pi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gutomec/nirvana-os-engine/judge-x.pi/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gutomec/nirvana-os-engine/judge-x.pi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gutomec/nirvana-os-engine/judge-x.pi.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.00894 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00447 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00179 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
judge-x-pi scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +16 tokens per session c6409144692d
- 9d ago First seen · 42 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A e2d05255c685
judge-x-pi is an agent published in the GitHub repository gutomec/nirvana-os-engine (73 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 894 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
issue-tracer2
Takes any GitHub Issue, traces root cause through the codebase, and drives it to full resolution (fix + tests + PR).
ci-fixer
Staged CI failure hunter and fixer for opencode-swarm. Triages GitHub Actions failures layer-by-layer (quality → unit → integration/dist/security/php → smoke), diagnoses root causes, applies minimal targeted fixes, verifies each fix does not mask downstream failures, and never guesses — only acts on evidence from…
docs-specialist
Expert technical writer focused on clear, complete, and continuously accurate documentation. Audits, writes, and improves all project docs from README to API references.
ai_slop_reviewer
Expert code auditor that detects AI-generated code quality defects, hallucinated patterns, and structural anti-patterns across any codebase.
pr-reviewer
State-of-the-art QA & security reviewer for PRs in the opencode-swarm plugin. Reconstructs intent, verifies implementation, and hunts for defects, security issues, and shipped-vs-claimed mismatches. Operates read-only. Never approves without positive evidence. Never invents repository facts.
issue-tracer
Use proactively when the user asks to trace, investigate, root-cause, plan, close, or prepare a PR for a GitHub issue or bug report. Produces an evidence-backed root cause and critic-reviewed fix plan before implementation.