Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to gvasile29/qai-consultant. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gvasile29/qai-consultant/master/.claude/agents/mcp-surface-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gvasile29/qai-consultantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gvasile29/qai-consultant/mcp-surface-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gvasile29/qai-consultant/mcp-surface-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gvasile29/qai-consultant/mcp-surface-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gvasile29/qai-consultant/mcp-surface-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gvasile29/qai-consultant/mcp-surface-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.01062 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.00425 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00212 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
mcp-surface-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed · -17 tokens per session 1e658118675d
- 16d ago First seen · 40 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 8b0588d96fa6
mcp-surface-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository gvasile29/qai-consultant (7 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 1,062 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-14.
Other agents, from other repositories
agent-sdk-verifier-py
Use this agent to verify that a Python Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a Python Agent SDK app has been created or modified.
codedna-reviewer
CodeDNA compliance reviewer. Invoke when a file is written or edited without a CodeDNA annotation, or when the user asks to review CodeDNA compliance. Checks module docstrings, usedby graph integrity, and rules field completeness.
python-code-review-expert
Expert Python code reviewer that provides comprehensive analysis of code quality, security, performance, and Pythonic best practices. Reviews Python codebases for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, and quality issues using confidence-based filtering. Use PROACTIVELY for Python code reviews and pull request…
type-design-analyzer
Expert type design analyst rating encapsulation, invariant expression, usefulness, and enforcement.
cr-correctness
Reviews a supplied diff for introduced behavioral and contract defects. Use only when dispatched by the code-review skill.
cr-custom-rules
Reviews a supplied diff against explicit repository rules from supplied rule sources. Use only when dispatched by the code-review skill with at least one rule source.