Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hackersandwizards/artificerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hackersandwizards/artificer/sdlc-10-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hackersandwizards/artificer/sdlc-10-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hackersandwizards/artificer/sdlc-10-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hackersandwizards/artificer/sdlc-10-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hackersandwizards/artificer/sdlc-10-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00267 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00133 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
sdlc-10-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Summarize the whole sdlc run into one concise final report for the chat, drawing on the prior stages' handoffs.
- Read the incoming handoff and trace back through what each prior stage produced: the plan and acceptance criteria, the tests, the implementation, the simplify pass, the two reviews, the converge verdict, the acceptance result, and the commit.
- Summarize what was built, referencing the concrete files added or changed.
- Summarize what was tested and the test outcome, what the reviews and converge verdict found, what acceptance verified in the browser, and the commit that recorded it.
- State whether the run met its acceptance criteria, calling out any unresolved issues or follow-ups.
- Output a single concise final report for the chat.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 21 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 26017468ce01
sdlc-10-report is an agent published in the GitHub repository hackersandwizards/artificer (16 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 267 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
patpat-reviewer
Independently challenge an implementation and its verification evidence without modifying repository or external state.
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
architect
System design, scalability analysis, and technology decision-making.
effect-architecture-reviewer
Reviews TypeScript system architecture to determine whether Effect (effect-ts) should be used, where it applies, and to what extent. Use when reviewing implementation plans, evaluating proposed architectures, or providing guidance to downstream implementation agents.
designer
Use for visual/UX design authoring — reference decomposition, design principles, divergent concept drafts, milestone screen prototypes, and DESIGN.md authoring support. Generation only; auditing stays with reviewer[design].
seo-analyst
An SEO analysis agent for improving how web content is organized for search engines. SEO means making pages easier for search engines to understand and show in results.