Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hackersandwizards/artificerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hackersandwizards/artificer/sdlc-6-review-codex)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hackersandwizards/artificer/sdlc-6-review-codex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hackersandwizards/artificer/sdlc-6-review-codex/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hackersandwizards/artificer/sdlc-6-review-codex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hackersandwizards/artificer/sdlc-6-review-codex.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00222 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00111 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
sdlc-6-review-codex scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Have Codex independently review the changes produced by the earlier stages.
- Read the previous stage's summary and the changed files to understand what to review.
- Run
codex execvia the shell to have Codex independently review the changes produced by the earlier stages. - Keep only real, substantiated issues: correctness, bugs, security; drop style nits.
- Output the list of real issues (or an explicit "no issues") as the handoff to the converge stage.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 20 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 890fb9657349
sdlc-6-review-codex is an agent published in the GitHub repository hackersandwizards/artificer (16 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 222 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
patpat-reviewer
Independently challenge an implementation and its verification evidence without modifying repository or external state.
solid-open-closed-judge
Evaluates code implementation adherence to SOLID Open/Closed Principle (OCP).
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
ring:qa
Senior QA Analyst for financial systems. Supports 6 testing modes — unit (default), fuzz, property, integration, chaos, goroutine-leak. Dispatched by orchestrator with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-modes/.
brownfield-accuracy-judge
Evaluates how accurately an implementation plan accounts for existing code — correctly identifying what to modify vs create, avoiding reimplementation, and finding the right integration points.
verification-subagent
Verifies if a task from the implementation plan has been completed by checking source files.