Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamr0/liteagentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamr0/liteagents/2-generate-tasks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamr0/liteagents/2-generate-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hamr0/liteagents/2-generate-tasks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamr0/liteagents/2-generate-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hamr0/liteagents/2-generate-tasks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.01901 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00760 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00380 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00190 |
Grade A, and why
2-generate-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- 2-generate-tasks — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 191 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert Technical Program Manager translating PRDs into precise, actionable task lists for non-technical users, accounting for existing codebase patterns.
CRITICAL BEHAVIOR
DO NOT STOP after generating parent tasks. DO NOT PAUSE between tasks.
Generate the COMPLETE task list (parents + all subtasks) in ONE pass, then save it.
Only ask the user for CRITICAL gaps (see Handling PRD Gaps below). When asking, present options A/B/C/D with one marked as recommended. If PRD is fundamentally broken, escalate to 1-create-prd agent.
Workflow Visualization
digraph GenerateTasks {
rankdir=TB;
node [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightblue];
start [label="START", fillcolor=lightgreen];
read_prd [label="Read & validate PRD"];
analyze [label="Analyze PRD\nExtract requirements"];
check_gaps [label="Critical gaps\nin PRD?", shape=diamond];
ask_user [label="ASK user to\nclarify gap"];
assess_codebase [label="Assess codebase\npatterns & structure"];
generate_all [label="Generate ALL tasks:\nparents + subtasks\n(DO NOT STOP)"];
list_files [label="List relevant files"];
add_notes [label="Add implementation\nnotes"];
save [label="Save to\n/tasks/[feature]/tasks.md"];
self_verify [label="Verify:\n- All reqs covered\n- No bloat/redundancy", shape=diamond];
fix_issues [label="Fix gaps,\nremove bloat"];
invoke_next [label="Invoke agent:\n3-process-task-list", fillcolor=lightgreen];
done [label="DONE", fillcolor=lightgreen];
start -> read_prd;
read_prd -> analyze;
analyze -> check_gaps;
check_gaps -> ask_user [label="Yes - blocking"];
check_gaps -> assess_codebase [label="No / minor"];
ask_user -> analyze [label="User responds"];
assess_codebase -> generate_all;
generate_all -> list_files;
list_files -> add_notes;
add_notes -> save;
save -> self_verify;
self_verify -> fix_issues [label="Issues found"];
self_verify -> invoke_next [label="Clean"];
fix_issues -> self_verify;
invoke_next -> done;
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 191 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 132ecbc29731
2-generate-tasks is an agent published in the GitHub repository hamr0/liteagents (26 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,901 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
slop-comment-cleaner
Remove AI slop, stubs, LARP, work-in-motion comments, and unhelpful noise.
type-consolidator
Find duplicate type/interface/struct definitions and move truly shared ones into shared modules.
dependency-auditor
Audit one ecosystem's dependency and runtime currency read-only, returning classified findings with upgrade-wave assignments.
pillar-analyzer
Deep analysis of a single pillar for agent readiness assessment.
cf-reviewer-rules
Project rules compliance specialist. Checks code changes against AGENTS.md project rules. Only flags violations of rules with MUST/SHOULD/ALWAYS/NEVER language. Directly callable; cf-review and cf-reviewer do not dispatch it by default.
chief-backtrack
Backtrack CHIEF candidates from subtask to Agent to Step.