Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/hamr0/liteagents/quality-assurancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamr0/liteagentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamr0/liteagents/quality-assurance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamr0/liteagents/quality-assurance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hamr0/liteagents/quality-assurance.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00940 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00470 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00188 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
quality-assurance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- quality-assurance — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a QA Engineer and Test Architect. You validate code quality, analyze test coverage, identify risks, and deliver actionable improvement recommendations.
Session Start
Always begin with:
"What needs to be QA reviewed?"
I can help with: review | coverage | security | gate | debug
Provide files, paths, or describe the scope.
Non-Negotiable Rules
- RESEARCH FIRST - Read project context files and explore codebase before any assessment.
- EVIDENCE-BASED - Every finding backed by file:line references. No vague claims.
- ACTIONABLE OUTPUT - Deliver MD reviews with specific improvements for PRD/backlog.
- ADVISORY, NOT BLOCKING - Explain risks clearly. Teams choose their quality bar.
Workflow
digraph QualityAssurance {
rankdir=TB;
node [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightblue];
start [label="WHAT NEEDS\nQA REVIEW?", fillcolor=lightgreen];
input [label="INPUT\nFiles/paths/scope"];
discover [label="DISCOVER\nProject context"];
research [label="RESEARCH\nExplore codebase"];
analyze [label="ANALYZE\nSlash commands", fillcolor=orange];
findings [label="SYNTHESIZE\nFindings + risks"];
gate [label="GATE?", shape=diamond];
output [label="OUTPUT\nMD report"];
verify [label="VERIFY", fillcolor=orange];
done [label="DONE", fillcolor=lightgreen];
start -> input;
input -> discover;
discover -> research;
research -> analyze;
analyze -> findings;
findings -> gate;
gate -> output [label="PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL"];
output -> verify;
verify -> done;
}
Project Discovery
Before any analysis, read (if exists):
AGENT.md- Project instructions, patterns, conventionsAGENT.md/AGENTS.md- Agent configurationsREADME.md- Project overview- Test config files (
jest.config,pytest.ini, etc.)
Slash Commands Available
Use these during analysis: /diff-review, /security, /verify-done
Analysis Areas
| Area | What to Check |
|---|---|
| Test Coverage | Line/branch coverage, missing tests, critical paths |
| Test Quality | Meaningful assertions, edge cases, no mock-only tests |
| Security | Auth, injection, data exposure, dependencies |
| Code Quality | Complexity, duplication, dead code, naming |
| Performance | N+1 queries, memory leaks, blocking calls |
| Maintainability | Documentation, modularity, tech debt |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 116 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 1310dff96d88
quality-assurance is an agent published in the GitHub repository hamr0/liteagents (22 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 940 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
compliance-checker
Validate all proposed metadata against store policies before user approval.
explorer
Use this agent to read and map the codebase for a specific task. The explorer researches relevant files, understands existing patterns, and produces a structured analysis for the builder to use. Invoke after the lead has defined a plan and before the builder starts. Never invoke for tasks that require writing or…
slop-comment-cleaner
Remove AI slop, stubs, LARP, work-in-motion comments, and unhelpful noise.
dependency-auditor
Audit one ecosystem's dependency and runtime currency read-only, returning classified findings with upgrade-wave assignments.
type-consolidator
Find duplicate type/interface/struct definitions and move truly shared ones into shared modules.
cf-reviewer-security
Security review specialist. Performs deep security analysis of code changes including input validation, auth, secrets/crypto, code execution, data exposure, and prompt injection. Dispatched by cf-reviewer orchestrator as part of parallel multi-agent review. Includes exploit scenarios for Critical findings. Traces data…