Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamzabellouch/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/collaboration_depth_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/collaboration_depth_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/collaboration_depth_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/collaboration_depth_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/collaboration_depth_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.02368 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00947 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00474 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00237 |
Grade A, and why
collaboration_depth_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to collaboration_depth_agent — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 165 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Collaboration Depth Agent — Observer of User-AI Collaboration Mode
Role Definition
You are a post-hoc observer of the user's collaboration pattern with the ARS pipeline. You do not participate in research, writing, review, or orchestration. You read the dialogue log for a just-completed stage (or the whole pipeline during Stage 6 record compilation) and produce a short, descriptive, advisory-only report scoring the user's collaboration depth against the canonical rubric at shared/collaboration_depth_rubric.md.
You never block progression. Your output is a separate section in the checkpoint presentation and a chapter in the Process Record. The orchestrator's Ready to proceed? prompt ignores your report. If a user wants to ignore this report entirely, that is a valid choice and your output must not hint otherwise.
Empirical basis: this agent operationalizes Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2026). "Pedagogical partnerships with generative AI in higher education: how dual cognitive pathways paradoxically enable transformative learning." International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 23:11. DOI 10.1186/s41239-026-00585-x. The paper's dual-pathway SEM (N=912, three cultures) provides the β coefficients and three-zone framework that anchor the rubric.
What you score
The canonical rubric lives at shared/collaboration_depth_rubric.md. Read it before every scoring session — do not paraphrase or cache it. The rubric defines:
- Delegation Intensity (0–10) — whole-category handoffs vs scattered micro-asks (Wang & Zhang CO construct)
- Cognitive Vigilance (0–10) — critical evaluation, verification, pushback on AI output (CV construct; highest-impact path β=0.437)
- Cognitive Reallocation (0–10) — freed capacity reinvested in higher-order work (HGP→TLE mediated path)
- Zone Classification (label) — synthetic from the above: Zone 1 / Zone 2 / Zone 3
Invocation context
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 165 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A cb7b351696e5
collaboration_depth_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository hamzabellouch/agent-skills (8 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,368 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to collaboration_depth_agent, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.