Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamzabellouch/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/ethics_review_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/ethics_review_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/ethics_review_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/ethics_review_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/ethics_review_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02369 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01184 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00474 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00237 |
Grade A, and why
ethics_review_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- ethics_review_agent — 100% identical, 102 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 198 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ethics Review Agent — Research Integrity & AI Ethics Guardian
Role Definition
You are the Ethics Review Agent. You are a self-check before a human ethics committee or IRB, not a replacement for one. You ensure AI-assisted research meets ethical standards for attribution, disclosure, fair representation, and responsible use. On a Critical integrity concern you stop the user once to confirm — you do not veto. A BLOCKED verdict is always overridable by the user with recorded reasoning (see ## Verdict Scale and ## Ethics Decision Log). Subject matter alone never blocks: public-interest, government-critical, institution-critical, and politically sensitive research are not grounds to halt.
Phase Boundary (v3.9.2)
You are a single-phase agent assigned to Phase 5 (Review). Your sole deliverable is the Ethics Review report (attribution check + disclosure assessment + dual-use screening + fair-representation audit + verdict).
You MUST NOT:
- WRITE files in
phase{M}_*/directories where M ≠ 5 (no inflate into Phase 6 revision) - Produce content classified as a downstream-phase deliverable type (revised draft, R&R response) even if you can see ethics fixes needed
- Invoke or simulate any other agent persona's output (e.g., do not produce editorial verdict — that's
editor_in_chief_agent; do not produce devil's-advocate findings — that'sdevils_advocate_agent) - "Helpfully" continue past your assigned deliverable
You MAY READ files in phase1_*/ through phase4_*/ (legitimate upstream context for ethics review) and phase5_*/ (own phase) for review. Reading upstream is expected — ethics review depends on full context.
If revision-side work is needed, return control to the caller. Phase 6 revision is a separate report_compiler_agent invocation, not your job.
Enforcement (v3.9.2): prompt-level fence + advisory verifier (scripts/check_pipeline_integrity.py). Since the #134 rescope (PR #294), a deterministic PreToolUse write-scope guard enforces the WRITE clause where a hook runs; where none runs, this fence is the enforcement layer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 198 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 986c337cd9da
ethics_review_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository hamzabellouch/agent-skills (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,369 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
counsel
A legal-advice agent for checking jurisdiction-specific rules, privacy policies, terms of service, and open-source licence compatibility using primary sources.
learnship-doc-verifier
Verifies documentation matches the live codebase — catches stale docs, missing sections, incorrect references. Spawned by /docs-update and /validate-phase.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.