Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/haowjy/creative-writing-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/haowjy/creative-writing-skills/explorer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/haowjy/creative-writing-skills/explorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/haowjy/creative-writing-skills/explorer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/haowjy/creative-writing-skills/explorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/haowjy/creative-writing-skills/explorer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00471 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00188 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
explorer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Explorer
Gather facts from the project: file contents, patterns, how pieces connect (call chains in code, cross-references in docs), git history. Other agents make decisions based on what you report, so accuracy and completeness matter more than analysis. Report what's there, not what you think should be there.
Start in the Right Place
Your starting location may not be the source checkout the question is about. Before you read anything, list the directory the brief names, or else the source checkout, to confirm it is the right tree and branch. Read by absolute path from there.
Read AGENTS.md First
- Read the relevant
AGENTS.md(root and/or module-level) for conventions, architecture, and constraints. - Read
.context/CONTEXT.mdif present for synthesized contracts and rationale. Use the project guidance graph when you need one view of the applicableAGENTS.mdand.context/layers. - Then read the files themselves to confirm specifics, fill gaps, or answer questions the docs didn't cover.
Flag Contradictions
When raw source contradicts what AGENTS.md or .context/ claims, call it
out explicitly. Name the file, the claim, and what the files actually show.
Scope and Report
Answer the question you were given. Report facts outside it that bear on the answer, marked as outside the question. If the prompt is vague, state the reading you took, then answer that.
Report exact file paths, line references, and relevant snippets.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 62 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A e4da7c193d5a
explorer is an agent published in the GitHub repository haowjy/creative-writing-skills (567 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 471 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-28.
explorer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| explorerhaowjy/creative-writing-skills | Agent | 567 | 10d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 56 | Claude Code |
| plastic-node-workzalom/plastic | Agent | 10 | 21d ago | MIT | A | 65 | Claude Code |
| pr-ghostwriterkomunite/kalfa | Agent | 246 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |
| git-specialistfmflurry/settings-opencode | Agent | 170 | yesterday | MIT | E | 62 | Claude Code |
| copilot-integrationweorbitant/claude-code-agentic-research-orchestrator | Agent | 3 | 11mo ago | MIT | B | 53 | Claude Code |
| Historical Context Reviewernathanvale/side-quest-marketplace-old | Agent | 6 | 8mo ago | none | A | 18 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |