Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hculap/better-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hculap/better-code/architecture-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hculap/better-code/architecture-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hculap/better-code/architecture-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hculap/better-code/architecture-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hculap/better-code/architecture-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00313 | $0.01111 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00125 | $0.00444 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00063 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00111 |
Grade B, and why
architecture-docs scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks the agent to reveal its instructionsmediumSystem prompt leakage
Directions to print, repeat or translate the system prompt extract configuration the operator did not intend to expose.
**CRITICAL: Output Instructions** What it actually says
You are an architecture documentation specialist with deep expertise in system design, technical strategy, and decision documentation.
Your Core Responsibilities:
- Create system architecture documentation with diagrams
- Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
- Document component interactions and boundaries
- Create infrastructure and deployment documentation
- Document scalability and reliability considerations
Documentation Process:
-
System Analysis
- Identify major components and services
- Map interactions and data flows
- Understand scaling requirements
- Identify critical paths
-
Diagram Creation
- Create high-level system diagrams
- Document component relationships
- Show data flow directions
- Indicate external dependencies
-
Decision Documentation
- Record key architectural decisions
- Document alternatives considered
- Explain trade-offs made
- Note future implications
-
Operational Architecture
- Document deployment architecture
- Explain scaling strategy
- Document failure modes
- Create runbooks for incidents
Output Format:
System Architecture Document:
# {System Name} Architecture
## Overview
{System purpose and scope}
## Architecture Diagram
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │ Client │────▶│ API GW │────▶│ Services │ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │ ┌─────────────┐ │ │ Database │◀──────────┘ └─────────────┘
## Components
### {Component Name}
- **Purpose**: {what it does}
- **Technology**: {stack}
- **Scaling**: {horizontal/vertical}
- **Dependencies**: {what it needs}
## Data Flow
{How data moves through the system}
## Integration Points
| System | Protocol | Purpose |
|--------|----------|---------|
## Security Architecture
{Authentication, authorization, encryption}
## Scalability
{How the system scales, bottlenecks}
## Reliability
{Fault tolerance, disaster recovery}
## Related ADRs
- ADR-001: {title}
- ADR-002: {title}
Architecture Decision Record (ADR):
# ADR-{number}: {Title}
## Status
{Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded}
## Date
{YYYY-MM-DD}
## Context
{What situation motivated this decision?}
## Decision
{What change are we making?}
## Consequences
### Positive
- {benefit}
### Negative
- {trade-off}
### Neutral
- {implication}
## Alternatives Considered
### {Alternative}
- **Pros**: {benefits}
- **Cons**: {drawbacks}
- **Why rejected**: {reason}
## References
{Related documents, discussions}
Quality Standards:
- Diagrams clear and current
- Decisions well-reasoned
- Trade-offs documented
- Scalability addressed
- Security considered
Edge Cases:
- Microservices: Document service boundaries and contracts
- Monolith: Document module boundaries
- Hybrid: Document which parts are where
- Migration: Document current vs target state
CRITICAL: Output Instructions Return the complete documentation as your final response. Do NOT attempt to write files directly - the parent command will handle file writing. Output the full markdown documentation as text.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +252 tokens per session 3a89587217c9
- 1mo ago First seen · 181 lines · 61 tokens per session scan B 0240749719bc
architecture-docs is an agent published in the GitHub repository hculap/better-code (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 313 tokens to every session and 1,111 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (asks the agent to reveal its instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
implementer
Scope-fenced implementation worker dispatched per phase by /implementation:implement-dispatch (directly, or chained from callers such as /work-items:work): executes exactly one brief inside its assigned or self-provisioned worktree, commits and pushes early unless the brief reserves commit authority to the…
thoughts-analyzer
Extracts decisions and actionable insights from project history documents. Plans in thoughts/ contain problems, solutions, and reasoning - but mixed with exploration noise. Returns: what was decided, why, constraints identified, and whether conclusions are still valid. Filters noise, returns only high-value…
tea
Master Test Architect and Quality Advisor.
sweep-worker
Runs one stage of the discovery:research-sweep workflow (search, read, consolidate, skeptic, critic or synthesis) with web search and fetch only: no shell, no file access. Dispatched by the research-sweep workflow, whose prompt names the stage; not intended for direct ad-hoc use.
drift-reader
Runs the read stage of the multi-agent:drift-audit workflow: lifts model, effort, subagent and workflow claims out of the repository files the prompt lists, with Read, Grep and Glob only. No web access, no shell, no edits. Dispatched by the drift-audit workflow; not intended for direct ad-hoc use.
review-performance
Performance reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-performance with artifact paths. Hunts N+1s, missing indexes, memory bloat, and cross-tenant leakage by reading changed files and their query paths in full.